Cited by 101Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Bifidobacterial Succession and Correlation Networks in a Large Unselected Cohort of Mothers and Their Children

Open access
Avershina, E., Storrø, O., Øien, T., Johnsen, R., Wilson, R., Egeland, T., Rudi, K.·2013·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Bifidobacteria are a major microbial component of infant gut microbiota, which is believed to promote health benefits for the host and stimulate maturation of the immune system. Despite their perceived importance, very little is known about the natural development of and possible correlations between bifidobacteria in human populations. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed stool samples from a randomly selected healthy cohort of 87 infants and their mothers with >90% of vaginal delivery and nearly 100% breast-feeding at 4 months. Fecal material was sampled during pregnancy, at 3 and 10 days, at 4 months, and at 1 and 2 years after birth. Stool samples were predicted to be rich in the species Bifidobacterium adolescentis , B. bifidum , B. dentium , B. breve , and B. longum . Due to high variation, we did not identify a clear age-related structure at the individual level. Within the population as a whole, however, there were clear age-related successions. Negative correlations between the B. longum group and B. adolescentis were detected in adults and in 1- and 2-year-old children, whereas negative correlations between B. longum and B. breve were characteristic for newborns and 4-month-old infants. The highly structured age-related development of and correlation networks between bifidobacterial species during the first 2 years of life mirrors their different or competing nutritional requirements, which in turn may be associated with specific biological functions in the development of healthy gut.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.02359-12

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bifidobacteria are numerically dominant members of the intestinal microbial communities by the age of 3 to 4 months.

    “Indeed, bifidobacteria are numerically dominant members of the intestinal microbial communities by the age of 3 to 4 months (15, 16).”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Bifidobacteria are among the best described gut bacteria with ability to utilize HMOs.

    “Bifidobacteria are among the best described gut bacteria with ability to utilize HMOs.”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 101

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]7. Ventura M, Turroni F, Bottacini F, Giubellini V, van Sinderen D. 2010. Bifidobacterial ecology and comparative genomics: perspectives and prospects, p 31–44 In Mayo B, van Sinderen D. (ed), Bifidobacteria: genomics and molecular aspects. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, England [Google Scholar]
  2. [13]13. Brisse S. 2009. Bifidobacterium MLST database: Bifidobacterium clpC alleles. Institut Pasteur, Paris, France: http://www.pasteur.fr/cgi-bin/genopole/PF8/mlstdbnet.pl?page=alleles&format=FASTA&locus=clpC&file=bifido_profiles.xml [Google Scholar]

Authors
Avershina, E., Storrø, O., Øien, T., Johnsen, R., Wilson, R., Egeland, T., & Rudi, K.
Affiliations
  • Hedmark University College (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2013-01-15
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
497-507
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2109360402
Cited by
101
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Bifidobacterium, infant gut microbiota, maternal gut microbiota, correlation networks, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium dentium, vaginal delivery, breastfeeding, gut microbiota development
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium, Child, DNA, Bacterial, Feces, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Molecular Sequence Data, Mothers, Genetic Variation, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gastrointestinal Tract, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review