The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate, Rapid Taxonomic Classification of Fungal Large-Subunit rRNA Genes
Open accessAbstract
Taxonomic and phylogenetic fingerprinting based on sequence analysis of gene fragments from the large-subunit rRNA (LSU) gene or the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is becoming an integral part of fungal classification. The lack of an accurate and robust classification tool trained by a validated sequence database for taxonomic placement of fungal LSU genes is a severe limitation in taxonomic analysis of fungal isolates or large data sets obtained from environmental surveys. Using a hand-curated set of 8,506 fungal LSU gene fragments, we determined the performance characteristics of a naïve Bayesian classifier across multiple taxonomic levels and compared the classifier performance to that of a sequence similarity-based (BLASTN) approach. The naïve Bayesian classifier was computationally more rapid (>460-fold with our system) than the BLASTN approach, and it provided equal or superior classification accuracy. Classifier accuracies were compared using sequence fragments of 100 bp and 400 bp and two different PCR primer anchor points to mimic sequence read lengths commonly obtained using current high-throughput sequencing technologies. Accuracy was higher with 400-bp sequence reads than with 100-bp reads. It was also significantly affected by sequence location across the 1,400-bp test region. The highest accuracy was obtained across either the D1 or D2 variable region. The naïve Bayesian classifier provides an effective and rapid means to classify fungal LSU sequences from large environmental surveys. The training set and tool are publicly available through the Ribosomal Database Project ( http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/classifier/classifier.jsp ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
Cited by
Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis
Cole, J. R., Wang, Q., Fish, J. A., Chai, B., McGarrell, D. M., Sun, Y., Brown, C. T., Porras-Alfaro, A., Kuske, C. R., & Tiedje, J. M. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1244 · Cited by 4,367
Self-citationFungal Identification Using Molecular Tools: A Primer for the Natural Products Research Community
Raja, H. A., Miller, A. N., Pearce, C. J., & Oberlies, N. H. (2017) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b01085 · Cited by 931
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
PacBio metabarcoding of Fungi and other eukaryotes: errors, biases and perspectives
Tedersoo, L., Tooming‐Klunderud, A., & Anslan, S. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14776 · Cited by 312
Scaling up: A guide to high‐throughput genomic approaches for biodiversity analysis
Porter, T. M., & Hajibabaei, M. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14478 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, K.-L., Porras-Alfaro, A., Kuske, C. R., Eichorst, S. A., & Xie, G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1523-1533
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2115838982
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate, Rapid Taxonomic Classification of Fungal Large-Subunit rRNA Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.06826-11
- The paper
- Liu, K.-L., Porras-Alfaro, A., Kuske, C. R., Eichorst, S. A., & Xie, G. (2012). Accurate, Rapid Taxonomic Classification of Fungal Large-Subunit rRNA Genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.06826-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.