The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Temperature, Aeration, and Moisture on CO 2 Formation in Bench-Scale, Continuously Thermophilic Composting of Solid Waste
Open accessAbstract
A compost production system was employed to supply uniform material for controlled experiments of factorial design. Over a 96-h composting period, the cumulative amount of CO 2 evolved was maximal at 56 to 60°C, an aeration rate that left an O 2 residual of 10 or 18% in the exhaust gas and a moisture content of 60% wet weight. Carbon dioxide evolution was submaximal at 64°C and higher.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Biology of Composting: a Review
de Bertoldi, M., Vallini, G., & Pera, A. (1983) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x8300100118 · Cited by 448
Eiland, F., Klamer, M., Lind, A.-M., Leth, M., & Bååth, E. (2001) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002480000071 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Suler, D. J., & Finstein, M. S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 345-350
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1797968578
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Temperature, Aeration, and Moisture on CO 2 Formation in Bench-Scale, Continuously Thermophilic Composting of Solid Waste. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.33.2.345-350.1977
- The paper
- Suler, D. J., & Finstein, M. S. (1977). Effect of Temperature, Aeration, and Moisture on CO 2 Formation in Bench-Scale, Continuously Thermophilic Composting of Solid Waste. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.33.2.345-350.1977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
