The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Numerically Dominant Denitrifying Bacteria from World Soils
Open accessAbstract
Nineteen soils, three freshwater lake sediments, and oxidized poultry manure were examined to determine the dominant denitrifier populations. The samples, most shown or expected to support active denitrification, were from eight countries and included rice paddy, temperate agricultural, rain forest, organic, and waste-treated soils. Over 1,500 organisms that could grow anaerobically on nitrate agar were isolated. After purification, 146 denitrifiers were obtained, as verified by production of N 2 from NO 3 - . These isolates were characterized by 52 properties appropriate for the Pseudomonas-Alcaligenes group. Numerical taxonomic procedures were used to group the isolates and compare them with nine known denitrifier species. The major group isolated was representative of Pseudonomas fluorescens biotype II. The second most prevalent group was representative of Alcaligenes . Other Pseudomonas species as well as members of the genus Flavobacterium , the latter previously not known to denitrify, also were identified. One-third of the isolates could not utilize glucose or other carbohydrates as sole carbon sources. Significantly, none of the numerically dominant denitrifiers we isolated resembled the most studied species: Pseudomonas denitrificans, Pseudomonas perfectomarinus , and Paracoccus denitrificans . Denitrification appears to be a property of a very diverse group of gram-negative, motile bacteria, as shown by the large number (22.6%) of ungrouped organisms. The diversity of denitrifiers from a given sample was usually high, with at least two groups present. Denitrifiers, nitrite accumulators, and organisms capable of anaerobic growth were present in the ratio of 0.20±0.23:0.81±0.23:1. There were few correlations between their numbers and the sample characteristics measured. However, the temperatures at which isolates could grow were significantly related to the temperatures of the environments from which they were isolated. Regression analysis revealed few relationships between physical parameters and bacterial types, save for the anaerobe numbers, in which 94% of the variance could be accounted for.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO)
Conrad, R. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.4.609-640.1996 · Cited by 1,751
Quantification of denitrifying bacteria in soils by nirK gene targeted real-time PCR
Henry, S., Baudoin, E., López-Gutiérrez, J. C., Martin-Laurent, F., Brauman, A., & Philippot, L. (2004) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2004.07.002 · Cited by 698
Betlach, M. R., & Tiedje, J. M. (1981) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.42.6.1074-1084.1981 · Cited by 593
Self-citationRütting, T., Boeckx, P., Müller, C., & Klemedtsson, L. (2011) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-8-1779-2011 · Cited by 503
Ecology of Denitrifying Prokaryotes in Agricultural Soil
Philippot, L., Hallin, S., & Schloter, M. (2007) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(07)96003-4 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Gamble, T. N., Betlach, M. R., & Tiedje, J. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1977-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 926-939
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1597936247
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerically Dominant Denitrifying Bacteria from World Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.33.4.926-939.1977
- The paper
- Gamble, T. N., Betlach, M. R., & Tiedje, J. M. (1977). Numerically Dominant Denitrifying Bacteria from World Soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.33.4.926-939.1977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.