The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge
Open accessAbstract
A laboratory study was conducted with the aim of evaluating and optimizing the environmental parameters of "landfarming", i.e., the disposal by biodegradation in soil of oily sludges generated in the refining of crude oil and related operations. Oil sludge biodegradation was monitored by CO2 evolution and by periodic analysis of residual hydrocarbons. The parameters studied were soil moisture, pH, mineral nutrients, micronutrients, organic supplements, treatment rate, teratment frequency, and incubation temperature. Oil sludge biodegradation was optimal at a soil water-holding capacity of 30 to 90%, a pH of 7.5 to 7.8, C:N and C:P ratios of 60:1 and 800:1, respectively, and a temperature of 20 degrees C or above. Addition of micronutrients and organic supplements was not beneficial; sewage sludge interfered with hydrocarbon biodegradation. Breakdown of the saturated hydrocarbon (alkane and cycloalkane) fraction was the highest at low application rates, but higher application rates favored the biodegradation of the aromatic and asphaltic fractions. An application rate of 5% (wt/wt) oil sludge hydrocarbon to the soil (100,000 liters/hectare) achieved a good compromise between high biodegradation rates and efficient land use and resulted in the best overall biodegradation rate of all hydrocarbon classes. Frequent small applications resulted in higher biodegradation than single large applications. Two 100,000-liter/hectare (255 barrels per acre) or four 50,000-liter/hectare oil sludge hydrocarbon applications per growing season seem appropriate for most temperate zone disposal sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment
Leahy, J. G., & Colwell, R. R. (1990) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.54.3.305-315.1990 · Cited by 2,572
Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective
Atlas, R. M. (1981) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.45.1.180-209.1981 · Cited by 1,895
Tyagi, M., da Fonseca, M. M. R., & de Carvalho, C. C. C. R. (2011) · Biodegradation · doi:10.1007/s10532-010-9394-4 · Cited by 845
Green Synthesis of Nanomaterials
Huston, M., DeBella, M., DiBella, M., & Gupta, A. (2021) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano11082130 · Cited by 502
Zhang, H., Yuan, X., Xiong, T., Wang, H., & Jiang, L. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.125657 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Dibble, J. T., & Bartha, R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 729-739
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1542562473
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.37.4.729-739.1979
- The paper
- Dibble, J. T., & Bartha, R. (1979). Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.37.4.729-739.1979
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.