The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Volatile Fatty Acids and Hydrogen as Substrates for Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Anaerobic Marine Sediment
Open accessAbstract
The addition of 20 mM MoO 4 2− (molybdate) to a reduced marine sediment completely inhibited the SO 4 2− reduction activity by about 50 nmol g −1 h −1 (wet sediment). Acetate accumulated at a constant rate of about 25 nmol g −1 h −1 immediately after MoO 4 2− addition and gave a measure of the preceding utilization rate of acetate by the SO 4 2− -reducing bacteria. Similarly, propionate and butyrate (including isobutyrate) accumulated at constant rates of 3 to 7 and 2 to 4 nmol g −1 h −1 , respectively. The rate of H 2 accumulation was variable, and a range of 0 to 16 nmol g −1 h −1 was recorded. An immediate increase of the methanogenic activity by 2 to 3 nmol g −1 h −1 was apparently due to a release of the competition for H 2 by the absence of SO 4 2− reduction. If propionate and butyrate were completely oxidized by the SO 4 2− -reducing bacteria, the stoichiometry of the reactions would indicate that H 2 , acetate, propionate, and butyrate account for 5 to 10, 40 to 50, 10 to 20, and 10 to 20%, respectively, of the electron donors for the SO 4 2− -reducing bacteria. If the oxidations were incomplete, however, the contributions by propionate and butyrate would only be 5 to 10% each, and the acetate could account for as much as two-thirds of the SO 4 2− reduction. The presence of MoO 4 2− seemed not to affect the fermentative and methanogenic activities; an MoO 4 2− inhibition technique seems promising in the search for the natural substrates of SO 4 2− reduction in sediments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Cited by
Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed-the role of sulphate reduction
Jørgensen, B. B. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/296643a0 · Cited by 1,540
Self-citationGhimire, A., Frunzo, L., Pirozzi, F., Trably, E., Escudie, R., Lens, P. N. L., & Esposito, G. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.045 · Cited by 1,027
Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine sediments
Canfield, D. E. (1994) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/0009-2541(94)90061-2 · Cited by 1,026
Bacterial Manganese and Iron Reduction in Aquatic Sediments
Thamdrup, B. (2000) · Advances in Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4187-5_2 · Cited by 659
Lovley, D. R., & Goodwin, S. (1988) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(88)90163-9 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Authors
- S�rensen, J., Christensen, D., & J�rgensen, B. B.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-11
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1568166854
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volatile Fatty Acids and Hydrogen as Substrates for Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Anaerobic Marine Sediment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.42.1.5-11.1981
- The paper
- S�rensen, J., Christensen, D., & J�rgensen, B. B. (1981). Volatile Fatty Acids and Hydrogen as Substrates for Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Anaerobic Marine Sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.42.1.5-11.1981
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.