The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kinetic Analysis of Competition Between Sulfate Reducers and Methanogens for Hydrogen in Sediments
Open accessAbstract
The competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for hydrogen was investigated in eutrophic lake sediments that contained low in situ sulfate concentrations and in sulfate-amended sediments. Sulfate reduction and methane production coexisted in situ in lake surface sediments (0 to 2 cm), but methane production was the dominant terminal process. Addition of 10 to 20 mM sulfate to sediments resulted in a decrease in the hydrogen partial pressure and a concomitant inhibition of methane production over time. Molybdate inhibition of sulfate reduction in sulfate-amended sediments was followed by an increase in the hydrogen partial pressure and the methane production rate to values comparable to those in sediments not amended with sulfate. The sulfate reducer population had a half-saturation constant for hydrogen uptake of 141 pascals versus 597 pascals for the methanogen population. Thus, when sulfate was not limiting, the lower half-saturation constant of sulfate reducers enabled them to inhibit methane production by lowering the hydrogen partial pressure below levels that methanogens could effectively utilize. However, methanogens coexisted with sulfate reducers in the presence of sulfate, and the outcome of competition at any time was a function of the rate of hydrogen production, the relative population sizes, and sulfate availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO)
Conrad, R. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.4.609-640.1996 · Cited by 1,751
Lovley, D. R., & Goodwin, S. (1988) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(88)90163-9 · Cited by 659
Self-citationCord-Ruwisch, R., Seitz, H.-J., & Conrad, R. (1988) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00411655 · Cited by 549
Iron formations: A global record of Neoarchaean to Palaeoproterozoic environmental history
Konhauser, K. O., Planavsky, N. J., Hardisty, D. S., Robbins, L. J., Warchola, T. J., Haugaard, R., Lalonde, S. V., Partin, C. A., Oonk, P. B. H., Tsikos, H., et al. (2017) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.012 · Cited by 537
Use of “Specific” Inhibitors in Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology
Oremland, R. S., & Capone, D. G. (1988) · Advances in Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5409-3_8 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovley, D. R., Dwyer, D. F., & Klug, M. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1373-1379
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1481349476
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetic Analysis of Competition Between Sulfate Reducers and Methanogens for Hydrogen in Sediments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.43.6.1373-1379.1982
- The paper
- Lovley, D. R., Dwyer, D. F., & Klug, M. J. (1982). Kinetic Analysis of Competition Between Sulfate Reducers and Methanogens for Hydrogen in Sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.43.6.1373-1379.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.