The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial properties of diacetyl
Open accessAbstract
Diacetyl preparations from three commercial sources were found to be essentially similar when tested primarily against a set of 40 cultures, including 10 of lactic acid bacteria, 4 of yeasts, 12 of gram-positive non-lactic acid bacteria, and 14 of gram-negative bacteria. The compound was effective at pH less than or equal to 7.0 and progressively ineffective at pH greater than 7.0. The lactic acid bacteria were essentially unaffected by concentrations between 100 and 350 micrograms/ml over the pH range of 5.0 to 7.0. Of the 12 gram-positive non-lactic acid bacteria, 11 were inhibited by 300 micrograms/ml at pH less than or equal to 7.0. The three yeasts and the 13 gram-negative bacteria that grew at pH 5.5 were inhibited by 200 micrograms/ml. Diacetyl was ineffective against four clostridia under anaerobic conditions. It was lethal for gram-negative bacteria and generally inhibitory for gram-positive bacteria. Nongrowing cells were not affected. The effectiveness of diacetyl was considerably less in brain heart infusion broth, Trypticase soy agar, and cooked-meat medium than in nutrient broth or plate count agar. The antimicrobial activity was antagonized by glucose, acetate, and Tween 80 but not by gluconic acid. As an antimicrobial agent, diacetyl was clearly more effective against gram-negative bacteria, yeasts, and molds than against gram-positive bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Food fermentations: Role of microorganisms in food production and preservation
Caplice, E. (1999) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00082-3 · Cited by 1,052
Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives
Schnürer, J., & Magnusson, J. (2005) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.014 · Cited by 702
Naturally occurring carbonyl compounds are mutagens Salmonella tester strain TA104
J. Marnett, L., Hurd, H. K., Hollstein, M. C., Levin, D. E., Esterbauer, H., & Ames, B. N. (1985) · Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/0027-5107(85)90204-0 · Cited by 586
Fermented milks and milk products as functional foods—A review
Shiby, V. K., & Mishra, H. N. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2010.547398 · Cited by 427
Ammor, S., Tauveron, G., Dufour, E., & Chevallier, I. (2006) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.02.006 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Jay, J. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 525-532
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1749803986
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial properties of diacetyl. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.44.3.525-532.1982
- The paper
- Jay, J. M. (1982). Antimicrobial properties of diacetyl. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.44.3.525-532.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.