The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 2: new biogroup pathogenic for eels
Open accessAbstract
Clinical and nonclinical isolates of the lactose-positive Vibrio vulnificus were compared with Vibrio strains isolated from lesions on eels (Anguilla japonica) cultured commercially in Japan. Strains were compared phenotypically and antigenically, for pathogenicity to mice and eels, and for genetic relatedness. The strains isolated from diseased eels differed phenotypically from the original species description of V. vulnificus in that they were negative for indole production, ornithine decarboxylase activity, growth at 42 degrees C, and acid production from mannitol and sorbitol. No relationship between the surface antigens of V. vulnificus strains from environmental and clinical sources and the strains from diseased eels was observed. Typical V. vulnificus strains and the eel isolates were pathogenic to mice; however, only those strains originally isolated from diseased eels were found to be pathogenic to eels. Results of DNA-DNA competition experiments revealed that there was greater than 90% relative reassociation between clinical and nonclinical V. vulnificus and strains from diseased eels. Based on the results of the DNA-DNA competition experiments, we conclude that the strains isolated from diseased eels were V. vulnificus; however, the differences in phenotypic characteristics and eel pathogenicity indicated that these strains represent a different biogroup. Therefore, we propose that strains phenotypically similar to the type strain of the species (ATCC 27562) be classified as V. vulnificus biogroup 1 and the strains phenotypically similar to those isolated from diseased eels be classified as V. vulnificus biogroup 2 represented by the reference strain ATCC 33148.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities
Lee, J.-H., & Lee, J. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00204.x · Cited by 1,059
Vibrio vulnificus: Disease and Pathogenesis
Jones, M. K., & Oliver, J. D. (2009) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01046-08 · Cited by 720
Non-Cholera Vibrios: The Microbial Barometer of Climate Change
Baker-Austin, C., Trinanes, J., Gonzalez-Escalona, N., & Martinez-Urtaza, J. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.008 · Cited by 459
Wound infections caused by Vibrio vulnificus and other marine bacteria
OLIVER, J. D. (2005) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268805003894 · Cited by 345
Pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus
Linkous, D. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-1097(99)00097-x · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Tison, D. L., Nishibuchi, M., Greenwood, J. D., & Seidler, R. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 640-646
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2157915435
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 2: new biogroup pathogenic for eels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.44.3.640-646.1982
- The paper
- Tison, D. L., Nishibuchi, M., Greenwood, J. D., & Seidler, R. J. (1982). Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 2: new biogroup pathogenic for eels. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.44.3.640-646.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.