The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sulfate Reducers Can Outcompete Methanogens at Freshwater Sulfate Concentrations
Open accessAbstract
Acetate and hydrogen metabolism by sulfate reducers and methanogens in the profundal sediments of an oligotrophic lake were examined. Inhibition of sulfate reduction with molybdate stimulated methane production from both hydrogen and acetate. Molybdate did not stimulate methane production in sediments that were preincubated to deplete the sulfate pool. Sulfate reduction accounted for 30 to 81% of the total of terminal metabolism proceeding through sulfate reduction and methane production in Eckman grab samples of surface sediments. The ability of sulfate reducers to effectively compete with methanogens for acetate was related to the sulfate reducers' lower half-saturation constant for acetate metabolism at in situ sulfate concentrations. Processes other than sulfate reduction and methanogenesis consumed hydrogen at elevated hydrogen partial pressures and prevented a kinetic analysis of hydrogen uptake by sulfate reducers and methanogens. The demonstration that sulfate reducers can successfully compete with methanogens for hydrogen and acetate in sediments at in situ sulfate concentrations of 60 to 105 μM extends the known range of sediment habitats in which sulfate reduction can be a dominant terminal process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Cited by
Lovley, D. R., & Goodwin, S. (1988) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(88)90163-9 · Cited by 659
Self-citationHao, O. J., Chen, J. M., Huang, L., & Buglass, R. L. (1996) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389609388489 · Cited by 554
Cord-Ruwisch, R., Seitz, H.-J., & Conrad, R. (1988) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00411655 · Cited by 549
Use of “Specific” Inhibitors in Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology
Oremland, R. S., & Capone, D. G. (1988) · Advances in Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5409-3_8 · Cited by 498
Holmes, D. E., Bond, D. R., O?Neil, R. A., Reimers, C. E., Tender, L. R., & Lovley, D. R. (2004) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-003-0004-4 · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovley, D. R., & Klug, M. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-192
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1587198095
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfate Reducers Can Outcompete Methanogens at Freshwater Sulfate Concentrations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.45.1.187-192.1983
- The paper
- Lovley, D. R., & Klug, M. J. (1983). Sulfate Reducers Can Outcompete Methanogens at Freshwater Sulfate Concentrations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.45.1.187-192.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.