Direct Measurements of Steady-State Kinetics of Cyanobacterial N 2 Uptake by Membrane-Leak Mass Spectrometry and Comparisons Between Nitrogen Fixation and Acetylene Reduction
Open accessAbstract
A mass spectrometer with a membrane-covered inlet was used to measure nitrogen fixation by following changes in the concentration of dissolved N 2 in a stirred suspension of the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis in an open system. The results showed a good fit to Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a K m for N 2 of 65 μM at 35°C, corresponding to 0.121 atmosphere of N 2 . Corresponding values for the K m for acetylene reduction were 385 μM (0.011 atmosphere at 35°C). Comparison of the values of V max for N 2 uptake with those for the acetylene reduction assay under similar conditions gave an average value of 3.8 for the conversion factor between N 2 and C 2 H 2 reduction. Reduction of protons to hydrogen was completely inhibited at sufficiently high concentrations of C 2 H 2 , but even at saturating N 2 concentrations, 1 mol of H 2 was produced for every mole of N 2 reduced. This explains the finding that the observed C 2 H 2 /N 2 ratio is higher than the value of 3 expected from the requirement for two electrons for acetylene reduction and six for nitrogen reduction. The results correlate well with a mechanism for N 2 reduction involving the equation: N 2 + 8H + + 8e − → 2NH 3 + H 2 which gives a conversion factor between C 2 H 2 and N 2 of 4. It is proposed that, in general, 4 is a more appropriate value than 3 for the conversion factor.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The measurement of the rate constant of this reaction for cyanobacteria indicates 36 kJ/mol above 21°C and 166 kJ/mol below 21°C.
“The measurement of the rate constant of this reaction for cyanobacteria (Jensen and Cox 1983) indicates 36 kJ/mol above 21 • C and 166 kJ/mol below 21 • C.”
From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as Jensen and Cox 1983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Camprubí, E., de Leeuw, J. W., House, C. H., Raulin, F., Russell, M. J., Spang, A., Tirumalai, M. R., & Westall, F. (2019) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0624-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jensen, B. B., & Cox, R. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1331-1337
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- PMC
- PMC242459
- OpenAlex
- W1862847733
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation, Anabaena variabilis, Michaelis-Menten kinetics, acetylene reduction, hydrogen production, steady-state kinetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review