The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Degradative Ability, Enzymatic Activity, and Palatability of Aquatic Hyphomycetes Grown on Leaf Litter
Open accessAbstract
Stream fungi have the capacity to degrade leaf litter and, through their activities, to transform it into a more palatable food source for invertebrate detritivores. The objectives of the present study were to characterize various aspects of fungal modification of the leaf substrate and to examine the effects these changes have on leaf palatability to detritivores. Fungal species were grown on aspen leaves for two incubation times. Leaves were analyzed to determine the weight loss, the degree of softening of the leaf matrix, and the concentrations of ATP and nitrogen associated with leaves. The activities of a protease and 10 polysaccharide-degrading enzymes produced by each fungus were also determined. Most fungi caused similar changes in physicochemical characteristics of the leaves. All fungi exhibited the capability to depolymerize pectin, xylan, and cellulose. Differences among fungi were found in their capabilities to produce protease and certain glycosidases. Leaf palatability was assessed by offering leaves of all treatments to larvae of two caddisfly shredders ( Trichoptera ). Feeding preferences exhibited by the shredders were similar and indicated that they perceived distinct differences among fungi. Two fungal species were highly consumed, some moderately and others only slightly. No relationships were found between any of the fungal characteristics measured and detritivore feeding preferences. Apparently, interspecific differences among fungi other than parameters associated with biomass or degradation of structural polysaccharides influence fungal palatability to caddisfly detritivores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems
Cummins, K. W. (1974) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1296676 · Cited by 1,413 · cited 3×
“terrestris 15 16 (12) 69 (7) 178 (30) 0 3 (1) 5 (0.”
Cited by
The Role of Invertebrates on Leaf Litter Decomposition in Streams - a Review
Graça, M. A. S. (2001) · International Review of Hydrobiology · doi:10.1002/1522-2632(200107)86:4/5<383::aid-iroh383>3.0.co;2-d · Cited by 787
Ergosterol-to-Biomass Conversion Factors for Aquatic Hyphomycetes
Gessner, M. O., & Chauvet, E. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.2.502-507.1993 · Cited by 469
Regulation of Leaf Breakdown by Fungi in Streams: Influences of Water Chemistry
Suberkropp, K., & Chauvet, E. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938146 · Cited by 422
Self-citationThe role of fungi in the nutrition of stream invertebrates
BÄRLOCHER, F. (1985) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1985.tb01137.x · Cited by 295
FERREIRA, V., & CHAUVET, E. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02185.x · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Suberkropp, K., Arsuffi, T. L., & Anderson, J. P.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-244
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1595515891
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Degradative Ability, Enzymatic Activity, and Palatability of Aquatic Hyphomycetes Grown on Leaf Litter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.46.1.237-244.1983
- The paper
- Suberkropp, K., Arsuffi, T. L., & Anderson, J. P. (1983). Comparison of Degradative Ability, Enzymatic Activity, and Palatability of Aquatic Hyphomycetes Grown on Leaf Litter. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.46.1.237-244.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.