The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surface thermodynamics of bacterial adhesion
Open accessAbstract
The adhesion of five strains of bacteria, i.e., Staphylococcus aureus (strain 049), Staphylococcus epidermidis (strain 047), Escherichia coli (strains 055 and 2627), and Listeria monocytogenes, to various polymeric surfaces was studied. The design of the experimental protocol was dictated by thermodynamic considerations. From the thermodynamic model for the adhesion of small particles from a suspension onto a solid substratum, it follows that the extent of adhesion is determined by the surface properties of all three phases involved, i.e., the surface tensions of the adhering particles, of the substrate, and of the suspending liquid medium. In essence, adhesion is more extensive to hydrophilic substrata (i.e., substrata of relatively high surface tension) than to hydrophobic substrata, when the surface tension of the bacteria is larger than that of the suspending medium. When the surface tension of the suspending liquid is larger than that of the bacteria, the opposite pattern of behavior prevails. Suspensions of bacteria at a concentration of 10(8) microorganisms per ml were brought into contact with several polymeric surfaces (Teflon, polyethylene, polystyrene, and acetal and sulfonated polystyrene) for 30 min at 20 degrees C. After rinsing, the number of bacteria adhering per unit surface area was determined by image analysis. The surface tension of the suspending medium. Hanks balanced salt solution, was modified through the addition of various amounts of dimethyl sulfoxide. It was found that the number of bacteria adhering per unit surface area correlates well with the thermodynamic predictions and that these data may be used to determine the surface tension of the different bacterial species. The surface tensions of the bacteria obtained in this fashion are in excellent agreement with those obtained by other methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions – its mechanisms and methods for study
Bos, R. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00396.x · Cited by 1,216
The DLVO theory in microbial adhesion
Hermansson, M. (1999) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/s0927-7765(99)00029-6 · Cited by 1,004
The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion
van Loosdrecht, M. C., Lyklema, J., Norde, W., Schraa, G., & Zehnder, A. J. (1987) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.53.8.1893-1897.1987 · Cited by 959
van Loosdrecht, M. C., Lyklema, J., Norde, W., Schraa, G., & Zehnder, A. J. (1987) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.53.8.1898-1901.1987 · Cited by 725
Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion
Busscher, H. J., Weerkamp, A. H., van der Mei, H. C., van Pelt, A. W., de Jong, H. P., & Arends, J. (1984) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.48.5.980-983.1984 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Absolom, D. R., Lamberti, F. V., Policova, Z., Zingg, W., van Oss, C. J., & Neumann, A. W.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-97
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1519847762
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surface thermodynamics of bacterial adhesion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.46.1.90-97.1983
- The paper
- Absolom, D. R., Lamberti, F. V., Policova, Z., Zingg, W., van Oss, C. J., & Neumann, A. W. (1983). Surface thermodynamics of bacterial adhesion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.46.1.90-97.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.