The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimum bacterial density for bacteriophage replication: implications for significance of bacteriophages in natural ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Bacteriophage 80 alpha did not increase in number in cultures containing less than about 1.0 X 10(4) to 1.5 X 10(4) CFU of Staphylococcus aureus per ml, but bacteriophage replication did occur when the number of bacteria exceeded this density, either initially or as a result of host cell multiplication. The minimum density of an asporogenous strain of Bacillus subtilis required for an increase in the number of bacteriophage SP beta cI was about 3 X 10(4) CFU/ml. The threshold density of Escherichia coli for the multiplication of bacteriophage T4 was about 7 X 10(3) CFU/ml. In the presence of montmorillonite, bacteriophage T4 did not increase in number until the E. coli population exceeded 10(4) CFU/ml. The mineralization of glucose was not affected in E. coli cultures inoculated with a low number of bacteriophage T4, but it could not be detected in cultures inoculated with a large number of phage. The numbers of bacteriophage T4 and a bacteriophage that lyses Pseudomonas putida declined rapidly after being added to lake water or sewage. We suggest that bacteriophages do not affect the number or activity of bacteria in environments where the density of the host species is below the host cell threshold of about 10(4) CFU/ml.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular biology of bacterial viruses
Stent, G. S. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 319
Molecular Biology of Bacterial Viruses
&NA; (1964) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-196404000-00034 · Cited by 308
Protozoa as Agents Responsible for the Decline of Xanthomonas campestris in Soil
Habte, M., & Alexander, M. (1975) · Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.29.2.159-164.1975 · Cited by 86
Self-citationTechnique for determining total bacterial virus counts in complex aqueous systems
Ewert, D. L., & Paynter, M. J. B. (1980) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.39.1.253-260.1980 · Cited by 10
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments
Bergh, Ø., BØrsheim, K. Y., Bratbak, G., & Heldal, M. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/340467a0 · Cited by 1,649
Sarker, S. A., Sultana, S., Reuteler, G., Moine, D., Descombes, P., Charton, F., Bourdin, G., McCallin, S., Ngom-Bru, C., Neville, T., et al. (2016) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.12.023 · Cited by 533
Biofilm susceptibility to bacteriophage attack: the role of phage-borne polysaccharide depolymerase
Hughes, K. A., Sutherland, I. W., & Jones, M. V. (1998) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-144-11-3039 · Cited by 360
Bacteriophage–host interaction: from splendid isolation into a messy reality
Brüssow, H. (2013) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2013.04.007 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiggins, B. A., & Alexander, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-23
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1799098265
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimum bacterial density for bacteriophage replication: implications for significance of bacteriophages in natural ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.49.1.19-23.1985
- The paper
- Wiggins, B. A., & Alexander, M. (1985). Minimum bacterial density for bacteriophage replication: implications for significance of bacteriophages in natural ecosystems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.49.1.19-23.1985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.