The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inactivation of biofilm bacteria
Open accessAbstract
The current project was developed to examine inactivation of biofilm bacteria and to characterize the interaction of biocides with pipe surfaces. Unattached bacteria were quite susceptible to the variety of disinfectants tested. Viable bacterial counts were reduced 99% by exposure to 0.08 mg of hypochlorous acid (pH 7.0) per liter (1 to 2 degrees C) for 1 min. For monochloramine, 94 mg/liter was required to kill 99% of the bacteria within 1 min. These results were consistent with those found by other investigators. Biofilm bacteria grown on the surfaces of granular activated carbon particles, metal coupons, or glass microscope slides were 150 to more than 3,000 times more resistant to hypochlorous acid (free chlorine, pH 7.0) than were unattached cells. In contrast, resistance of biofilm bacteria to monochloramine disinfection ranged from 2- to 100-fold more than that of unattached cells. The results suggested that, relative to inactivation of unattached bacteria, monochloramine was better able to penetrate and kill biofilm bacteria than free chlorine. For free chlorine, the data indicated that transport of the disinfectant into the biofilm was a major rate-limiting factor. Because of this phenomenon, increasing the level of free chlorine did not increase disinfection efficiency. Experiments where equal weights of disinfectants were used suggested that the greater penetrating power of monochloramine compensated for its limited disinfection activity. These studies showed that monochloramine was as effective as free chlorine for inactivation of biofilm bacteria. The research provides important insights into strategies for control of biofilm bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance
McDonnell, G., & Russell, A. D. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.147 · Cited by 4,780
What are Bacterial Extracellular Polymeric Substances?
Wingender, J., Neu, T. R., & Flemming, H.-C. (1999) · Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60147-7_1 · Cited by 655
Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry
Carpentier, B., & Cerf, O. (1993) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb01587.x · Cited by 600
Microbiological Safety of Drinking Water
Szewzyk, U., Szewzyk, R., Manz, W., & Schleifer, K.-H. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.81 · Cited by 580
Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection
De Beer, D., Srinivasan, R., & Stewart, P. S. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.12.4339-4344.1994 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- LeChevallier, M. W., Cawthon, C. D., & Lee, R. G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2492-2499
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1562655202
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inactivation of biofilm bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.54.10.2492-2499.1988
- The paper
- LeChevallier, M. W., Cawthon, C. D., & Lee, R. G. (1988). Inactivation of biofilm bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.10.2492-2499.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.