The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rates of Microbial Metabolism in Deep Coastal Plain Aquifers
Open accessAbstract
Rates of microbial metabolism in deep anaerobic aquifers of the Atlantic coastal plain of South Carolina were investigated by both microbiological and geochemical techniques. Rates of [2- 14 C]acetate and [U- 14 C]glucose oxidation as well as geochemical evidence indicated that metabolic rates were faster in the sandy sediments composing the aquifers than in the clayey sediments of the confining layers. In the sandy aquifer sediments, estimates of the rates of CO 2 production (millimoles of CO 2 per liter per year) based on the oxidation of [2- 14 C] acetate were 9.4 × 10 −3 to 2.4 × 10 −1 for the Black Creek aquifer, 1.1 × 10 −2 for the Middendorf aquifer, and <7 × 10 −5 for the Cape Fear aquifer. These estimates were at least 2 orders of magnitude lower than previously published estimates that were based on the accumulation of CO 2 in laboratory incubations of similar deep subsurface sediments. In contrast, geochemical modeling of groundwater chemistry changes along aquifer flowpaths gave rate estimates that ranged from 10 −4 to 10 −6 mmol of CO 2 per liter per year. The age of these sediments (ca. 80 million years) and their organic carbon content suggest that average rates of CO 2 production could have been no more than 10 −4 mmol per liter per year. Thus, laboratory incubations may greatly overestimate the in situ rates of microbial metabolism in deep subsurface environments. This has important implications for the use of laboratory incubations in attempts to estimate biorestoration capacities of deep aquifers. The rate estimates from geochemical modeling indicate that deep aquifers are among the most oligotrophic aquatic environments in which there is ongoing microbial metabolism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Temperature dependence of metabolic rates for microbial growth, maintenance, and survival
Price, P. B., & Sowers, T. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400522101 · Cited by 816
Bacterial Manganese and Iron Reduction in Aquatic Sediments
Thamdrup, B. (2000) · Advances in Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4187-5_2 · Cited by 659
Deep subsurface microbial processes
Lovley, D. R., & Chapelle, F. H. (1995) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/95rg01305 · Cited by 489
Self-citationMicrobial Fe(III) reduction in subsurface environments
Lovley, D. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00013-2 · Cited by 417
Self-citationLarter, S., Wilhelms, A., Head, I., Koopmans, M., Aplin, A., Di Primio, R., Zwach, C., Erdmann, M., & Telnaes, N. (2003) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0146-6380(02)00240-1 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapelle, F. H., & Lovley, D. R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1865-1874
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2109069424
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rates of Microbial Metabolism in Deep Coastal Plain Aquifers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.56.6.1865-1874.1990
- The paper
- Chapelle, F. H., & Lovley, D. R. (1990). Rates of Microbial Metabolism in Deep Coastal Plain Aquifers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.6.1865-1874.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.