The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of aromatic substitution patterns on azo dye degradability by Streptomyces spp. and Phanerochaete chrysosporium
Open accessAbstract
Twenty-two azo dyes were used to study the influence of substituents on azo dye biodegradability and to explore the possibility of enhancing the biodegradabilities of azo dyes without affecting their properties as dyes by changing their chemical structures. Streptomyces spp. and Phanerochaete chrysosporium were used in the study. None of the actinomycetes (Streptomyces rochei A10, Streptomyces chromofuscus A11, Streptomyces diastaticus A12, S. diastaticus A13, and S. rochei A14) degraded the commercially available Acid Yellow 9. Decolorization of monosulfonated mono azo dye derivatives of azobenzene by the Streptomyces spp. was observed with five azo dyes having the common structural pattern of a hydroxy group in the para position relative to the azo linkage and at least one methoxy and/or one alkyl group in an ortho position relative to the hydroxy group. The fungus P. chrysosporium attacked Acid Yellow 9 to some extent and extensively decolorized several azo dyes. A different pattern was seen for three mono azo dye derivatives of naphthol. Streptomyces spp. decolorized Orange I but not Acid Orange 12 or Orange II. P. chrysosporium, though able to transform these three azo dyes, decolorized Acid Orange 12 and Orange II more effectively than Orange I. A correlation was observed between the rate of decolorization of dyes by Streptomyces spp. and the rate of oxidative decolorization of dyes by a commercial preparation of horseradish peroxidase type II, extracellular peroxidase preparations of S. chromofuscus A11, or Mn(II) peroxidase from P. chrysosporium. Ligninase of P. chrysosporium showed a dye specificity different from that of the other oxidative enzymes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial decolorization of textile-dyecontaining effluents: A review
Banat, I. M., Nigam, P., Singh, D., & Marchant, R. (1996) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(96)00113-7 · Cited by 1,502
Vandevivere, P. C., Bianchi, R., & Verstraete, W. (1998) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4660(199808)72:4<289::aid-jctb905>3.0.co;2-# · Cited by 1,050
Fungal decolorization of dye wastewaters: a review
Fu, Y., & Viraraghavan, T. (2001) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00028-1 · Cited by 910
Microbial decolouration of azo dyes: A review
Solís, M., Solís, A., Pérez, H. I., Manjarrez, N., & Flores, M. (2012) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2012.08.014 · Cited by 836
Hao, O. J., Kim, H., & Chiang, P.-C. (2000) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380091184237 · Cited by 811
Metadata
- Authors
- Pasti-Grigsby, M. B., Paszczynski, A., Goszczynski, S., Crawford, D. L., & Crawford, R. L.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3605-3613
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1905953008
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of aromatic substitution patterns on azo dye degradability by Streptomyces spp. and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.58.11.3605-3613.1992
- The paper
- Pasti-Grigsby, M. B., Paszczynski, A., Goszczynski, S., Crawford, D. L., & Crawford, R. L. (1992). Influence of aromatic substitution patterns on azo dye degradability by Streptomyces spp. and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.58.11.3605-3613.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.