The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhanced control of Listeria monocytogenes by in situ-produced pediocin during dry fermented sausage production
Open accessAbstract
To determine whether pediocin is produced and has effective antilisterial activity during food fermentation, six sausage fermentation trials were conducted with antibiotic-resistant, pediocin-producing (Bac+) Pediococcus acidilactici PAC 1.0 (Strr Rifr) and an isogenic pediocin-negative (Bac-) derivative used as a control. Meat was inoculated (ca. 10(5) CFU/g) with a composite of five Listeria monocytogenes strains, each electrotransformed with pGK12 (Cmr Emr). P. acidilactici and L. monocytogenes populations were selectively enumerated by plating on media with antibiotics. This study indicated that the dry sausage fermentation process can reduce L. monocytogenes populations. Effective inactivation of L. monocytogenes was observed when the pH at the end of the fermentation portion of the process was less than 4.9. Pediocin was responsible for part of the antilisterial activity during the fermentation in each of the six trials. Furthermore, inhibition of L. monocytogenes during drying was enhanced in the presence of pediocin in the three trials in which L. monocytogenes could be detected throughout the drying process. Thus, pediocin production contributed to an increase in safety during both the fermentation and drying portions of sausage manufacturing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation.
Cleveland, J., Montville, T. J., Nes, I. F., & Chikindas, M. L. (2001) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00560-8 · Cited by 1,835
Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry
Leroy, F., & De Vuyst, L. (2004) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.004 · Cited by 1,852
Food fermentations: Role of microorganisms in food production and preservation
Caplice, E. (1999) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00082-3 · Cited by 1,052
Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria
Stiles, M. E. (1996) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/bf00395940 · Cited by 733
Bacteriocins and their food applications
And, H. C., & Hoover, D. G. (2003) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00016.x · Cited by 550
Metadata
- Authors
- Foegeding, P. M., Thomas, A. B., Pilkington, D. H., & Klaenhammer, T. R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 884-890
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1693072994
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced control of Listeria monocytogenes by in situ-produced pediocin during dry fermented sausage production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.58.3.884-890.1992
- The paper
- Foegeding, P. M., Thomas, A. B., Pilkington, D. H., & Klaenhammer, T. R. (1992). Enhanced control of Listeria monocytogenes by in situ-produced pediocin during dry fermented sausage production. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.58.3.884-890.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.