The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria
Open accessAbstract
The redox dye 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC) was employed for direct epifluorescent microscopic enumeration of respiring bacteria in environmental samples. Oxidized CTC is nearly colorless and is nonfluorescent; however, the compound is readily reduced via electron transport activity to fluorescent, insoluble CTC-formazan, which accumulates intracellularly. Bacteria containing CTC-formazan were visualized by epifluorescence microscopy in wet-mount preparations, on polycarbonate membrane filter surfaces, or in biofilms associated with optically opaque surfaces. Counterstaining of CTC-treated samples with the DNA-specific fluorochrome 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole allowed enumeration of active and total bacterial subpopulations within the same preparation. Municipal wastewater, groundwater, and seawater samples supplied with exogenous nutrients yielded CTC counts that were generally lower than total 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole counts but typically equal to or greater than standard heterotrophic (aerobic) plate counts. In unsupplemented water samples, CTC counts were typically lower than those obtained with the heterotrophic plate count method. Reduction of CTC by planktonic or biofilm-associated bacteria was suppressed by formaldehyde, presumably because of inhibition of electron transport activity and other metabolic processes. Because of their bright red fluorescence (emission maximum, 602 nm), actively respiring bacteria were readily distinguishable from abiotic particles and other background substances, which typically fluoresced at shorter wavelengths. The use of CTC greatly facilitated microscopic detection and enumeration of metabolically active (i.e., respiring) bacteria in environmental samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,327
Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction
Berridge, M. V., Herst, P. M., & Tan, A. S. (2005) · Biotechnology Annual Review · doi:10.1016/s1387-2656(05)11004-7 · Cited by 2,222
Boulos, L., Prévost, M., Barbeau, B., Coallier, J., & Desjardins, R. (1999) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(99)00048-2 · Cited by 1,125
Existing and potential applications of ultraviolet light in the food industry - a critical review
Bintsis, T., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E., & Robinson, R. K. (2000) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(20000501)80:6<637::aid-jsfa603>3.0.co;2-1 · Cited by 788
Microbiological Safety of Drinking Water
Szewzyk, U., Szewzyk, R., Manz, W., & Schleifer, K.-H. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.81 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodriguez, G. G., Phipps, D., Ishiguro, K., & Ridgway, H. F.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1801-1808
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1919954453
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.58.6.1801-1808.1992
- The paper
- Rodriguez, G. G., Phipps, D., Ishiguro, K., & Ridgway, H. F. (1992). Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.58.6.1801-1808.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.