The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria, O2, and H2S in photosynthetic biofilms determined by oligonucleotide probes and microelectrodes
Open accessAbstract
The vertical distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in photosynthetic biofilms from the trickling filter of a sewage treatment plant was investigated with oligonucleotide probes binding to 16S rRNA. To demonstrate the effect of daylight and photosynthesis and thereby of increased oxygen penetration, we incubated two 4-mm-thick biofilm samples in darkness or exposed to light at natural intensity. Gradients of O2, H2S, and pH were examined with microelectrodes during incubation. The samples were subsequently frozen with liquid nitrogen and sliced on a cryomicrotome in 20-microns vertical slices. Fluorescent-dye-conjugated oligonucleotides were used as "phylogenetic" probes to identify single cells in the slices. Oligonucleotide sequences were selected which were complementary to short sequence elements (16 to 20 nucleotides) within the 16S rRNA of sulfate-reducing bacteria. The probes were labeled with fluorescein or rhodamine derivatives for subsequent visualization by epifluorescence microscopy. Five probes were synthesized for eukaryotes, eubacteria, SRB (including most species of the delta group of purple bacteria), Desulfobacter spp., and a nonhybridizing control. The SRB were unevenly distributed in the biofilm, being present in all states from single scattered cells to dense clusters of several thousand cells. To quantify the vertical distribution of SRB, we counted cells along vertical transects through the biofilm. This was done in a blind experiment to ascertain the reliability of the staining. A negative correlation between the vertical distribution of positively stained SRB cells and the measured O2 profiles was found. The distribution differed in light- and dark-incubated samples presumably because of the different extensions of the oxic surface layer. In both cases the SRB were largely restricted to anoxic layers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,327
The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections
Bjarnsholt, T. (2013) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/apm.12099 · Cited by 1,080
Rickard, D., & Morse, J. W. (2005) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2005.08.004 · Cited by 632
Espey, M. G. (2013) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.10.554 · Cited by 396
Dissimilatory Sulfate- and Sulfur-Reducing Prokaryotes
Rabus, R., Hansen, T. A., & Widdel, F. (2006) · The Prokaryotes · doi:10.1007/0-387-30742-7_22 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsing, N. B., Kühl, M., & Jørgensen, B. B.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3840-3849
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1480969938
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria, O2, and H2S in photosynthetic biofilms determined by oligonucleotide probes and microelectrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.59.11.3840-3849.1993
- The paper
- Ramsing, N. B., Kühl, M., & Jørgensen, B. B. (1993). Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria, O2, and H2S in photosynthetic biofilms determined by oligonucleotide probes and microelectrodes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.11.3840-3849.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.