The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific genomic fingerprints of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas pathovars and strains generated with repetitive sequences and PCR
Open accessAbstract
DNA primers corresponding to conserved motifs in bacterial repetitive (REP, ERIC, and BOX) elements and PCR were used to show that REP-, ERIC-, and BOX-like DNA sequences are widely distributed in phytopathogenic Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas strains. REP-, ERIC, and BOX-PCR (collectively known as rep-PCR) were used to generate genomic fingerprints of a variety of Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas isolates and to identify pathovars and strains that were previously not distinguishable by other classification methods. Analogous rep-PCR-derived genomic fingerprints were generated from purified genomic DNA, colonies on agar plates, liquid cultures, and directly from lesions on infected plants. REP, ERIC, and BOX-PCR-generated fingerprints of specific Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas strains were found to yield similar conclusions wtih regard to the identity of and relationship between these strains. This suggests that the distribution of REP-, ERIC, and BOX-like sequences in these strains is a reflection of their genomic structure. Thus, the rep-PCR technique appears to be a rapid, simple, and reproducible method to identify and classify Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas strains, and it may be a useful diagnostic tool for these important plant pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hirano, S. S., & Upper, C. D. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.3.624-653.2000 · Cited by 915
Opening the black box of soil microbial diversity
Tiedje, J. M., Asuming-Brempong, S., Nüsslein, K., Marsh, T. L., & Flynn, S. J. (1999) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(99)00026-8 · Cited by 485
Vera Cruz, C. M., Bai, J., Oña, I., Leung, H., Nelson, R. J., Mew, T.-W., & Leach, J. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.250271997 · Cited by 294
Tyler, K. D., Wang, G., Tyler, S. D., & Johnson, W. M. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.35.2.339-346.1997 · Cited by 285
Suleman, M., Yasmin, S., Rasul, M., Yahya, M., Atta, B. M., & Mirza, M. S. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204408 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Louws, F. J., Fulbright, D. W., Stephens, C. T., & de Bruijn, F. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2286-2295
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1521703296
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific genomic fingerprints of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas pathovars and strains generated with repetitive sequences and PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.60.7.2286-2295.1994
- The paper
- Louws, F. J., Fulbright, D. W., Stephens, C. T., & de Bruijn, F. J. (1994). Specific genomic fingerprints of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas pathovars and strains generated with repetitive sequences and PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.7.2286-2295.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.