The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Significance of bacteriophages for controlling bacterioplankton growth in a mesotrophic lake
Open accessAbstract
Bacterium-specific viruses have attracted much interest in aquatic microbial ecology because they have been shown to be about 10 times more abundant than planktonic bacteria. So far most of the studies of interactions of planktonic bacteria and viruses have been done in marine environments, and very little is known about these interactions in lakes. Therefore, we studied phage proliferation in Lake Constance, a large mesotrophic lake in Germany. We enumerated bacteria and quantified the fraction of bacteria with mature intracellular phage particles and the number of free viruses by transmission electron microscopy. Between the end of March and early August 1992, peaks of bacterial abundance were followed in 1 to 2 weeks by peaks in the fraction of bacteria containing visible phage particles (0 to 1.7%) and in the number of free viruses (1 x 10(sup7) to 4 x 10(sup7) ml(sup-1)). We estimated that 1 to 17% +/- 12% of all bacteria were phage infected, implying that phage-induced mortality was <34% +/- 24% of total mortality. A direct comparison between phage-induced mortality, the net decrease of bacterial numbers, and bacterial growth rates indicated that phage-induced mortality accounted for <11% of total bacterial mortality during the phytoplankton spring bloom and 18 to 21% following the bloom. Estimated burst sizes ranged from 21 to 121 phages. Phage production rates of 0.5 x 10(sup6) to 2.5 x 10(sup6) ml(sup-1) day(sup-1) accounted for 70 to 380% of the observed net increase rates of free phages, implying high rates of simultaneous phage decay. The cyclic dynamics between bacteria and phages and the varying size structure of the intracellular mature phage particles suggested that phage infection was important in structuring the bacterial host assemblage during the study period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Early life dynamics of the human gut virome and bacterial microbiome in infants
Lim, E. S., Zhou, Y., Zhao, G., Bauer, I. K., Droit, L., Ndao, I. M., Warner, B. B., Tarr, P. I., Wang, D., & Holtz, L. R. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3950 · Cited by 658
Viruses and protists cause similar bacterial mortality in coastal seawater
Fuhrman, J. A., & Noble, R. T. (1995) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1995.40.7.1236 · Cited by 478
Freshwater and marine virioplankton: a brief overview of commonalities and differences
WILHELM, S. W., & MATTESON, A. R. (2008) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01980.x · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Hennes, K. P., & Simon, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 333-340
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2147911820
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of bacteriophages for controlling bacterioplankton growth in a mesotrophic lake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.61.1.333-340.1995
- The paper
- Hennes, K. P., & Simon, M. (1995). Significance of bacteriophages for controlling bacterioplankton growth in a mesotrophic lake. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.1.333-340.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.