The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Capacity for methane oxidation in landfill cover soils measured in laboratory-scale soil microcosms
Open accessAbstract
Laboratory-scale soil microcosms containing different soils were permeated with CH(inf4) for up to 6 months to investigate their capacity to develop a methanotrophic community. Methane emissions were monitored continuously until steady states were established. The porous, coarse sand soil developed the greatest methanotrophic capacity (10.4 mol of CH(inf4) (middot) m(sup-2) (middot) day(sup-1)), the greatest yet reported in the literature. Vertical profiles of O(inf2), CH(inf4), and methanotrophic potential in the soils were determined at steady state. Methane oxidation potentials were greatest where the vertical profiles of O(inf2) and CH(inf4) overlapped. A significant increase in the organic matter content of the soil, presumably derived from methanotroph biomass, occurred where CH(inf4) oxidation was greatest. Methane oxidation kinetics showed that a soil community with a low methanotrophic capacity (V(infmax) of 258 nmol (middot) g of soil(sup-1) (middot) h(sup-1)) but relatively high affinity (k(infapp) of 1.6 (mu)M) remained in N(inf2)-purged control microcosms, even after 6 months without CH(inf4). We attribute this to a facultative, possibly mixotrophic, methanotrophic microbial community. When purged with CH(inf4), a different methanotrophic community developed which had a lower affinity (k(infapp) of 31.7 (mu)M) for CH(inf4) but a greater capacity (V(infmax) of 998 nmol (middot) g of soil(sup-1) (middot) h(sup-1)) for CH(inf4) oxidation, reflecting the enrichment of an active high-capacity methanotrophic community. Compared with the unamended control soil, amendment of the coarse sand with sewage sludge enhanced CH(inf4) oxidation capacity by 26%; K(inf2)HPO(inf4) amendment had no significant effect, while amendment with NH(inf4)NO(inf3) reduced the CH(inf4) oxidation capacity by 64%. In vitro experiments suggested that NH(inf4)NO(inf3) additions (10 and 71 (mu)mol (middot) g of soil(sup-1)) inhibited CH(inf4) oxidation by a nonspecific ionic effect rather than by specific inhibition by NH(inf4)(sup+).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enrichment, Isolation and Some Properties of Methane-utilizing Bacteria
Whittenbury, R., Phillips, K. C., & Wilkinson, J. F. (1970) · Journal of General Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-61-2-205 · Cited by 1,443
Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes in native, fertilized and cultivated grasslands
Mosier, A., Schimel, D., Valentine, D., Bronson, K., & Parton, W. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350330a0 · Cited by 975
Bédard, C., & Knowles, R. (1989) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.53.1.68-84.1989 · Cited by 898
Influence of nitrogen fertilization on methane uptake in temperate forest soils
Steudler, P. A., Bowden, R. D., Melillo, J. M., & Aber, J. D. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/341314a0 · Cited by 777
Colby, J., Stirling, D. I., & Dalton, H. (1977) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1650395 · Cited by 582
Rapid Methane Oxidation in a Landfill Cover Soil
Whalen, S. C., Reeburgh, W. S., & Sandbeck, K. A. (1990) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.56.11.3405-3411.1990 · Cited by 508
Microbial growth on C[1] compounds
Murrell, J. C., & Kelly, D. P. (1993) · Intercept eBooks · Cited by 493
Continuing Worldwide Increase in Tropospheric Methane, 1978 to 1987
Blake, D. R., & Rowland, F. S. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.239.4844.1129 · Cited by 453
Adamsen, A. P. S., & King, G. M. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.2.485-490.1993 · Cited by 386
Consumption of atmospheric methane by tundra soils
Whalen, S. C., & Reeburgh, W. S. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346160a0 · Cited by 346
Cited by
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO)
Conrad, R. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.4.609-640.1996 · Cited by 1,751
Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes
Segers, R. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005929032764 · Cited by 907
Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments
Bodelier, P. L. E., & Laanbroek, H. J. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00304-0 · Cited by 829
Semrau, J. D., DiSpirito, A. A., & Yoon, S. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00212.x · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Kightley, D., Nedwell, D. B., & Cooper, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 592-601
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1828187631
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 34.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capacity for methane oxidation in landfill cover soils measured in laboratory-scale soil microcosms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.61.2.592-601.1995
- The paper
- Kightley, D., Nedwell, D. B., & Cooper, M. (1995). Capacity for methane oxidation in landfill cover soils measured in laboratory-scale soil microcosms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.2.592-601.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.