The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial community structures of phosphate-removing and non-phosphate-removing activated sludges from sequencing batch reactors
Open accessAbstract
The bacterial community structures of phosphate- and non-phosphate-removing activated sludges were compared. Sludge samples were obtained from two sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), and 16S rDNA clone libraries of the bacterial sludge populations were established. Community structures were determined by phylogenetic analyses of 97 and 92 partial clone sequences from SBR1 (phosphate-removing sludge) and SBR2 (non-phosphate-removing sludge), respectively. For both sludges, the predominant bacterial group with which clones were affiliated was the beta subclass of the proteobacteria. Other major groups represented were the alpha proteobacterial subclass, planctomycete group, and Flexibacter-Cytophaga-Bacteroides group. In addition, several clone groups unaffiliated with known bacterial assemblages were identified in the clone libraries. Acinetobacter spp., thought to be important in phosphate removal in activated sludge, were poorly represented by clone sequences in both libraries. Differences in community structure were observed between the phosphate- and non-phosphate-removing sludges; in particular, the Rhodocyclus group within the beta subclass was represented to a greater extent in the phosphate-removing community. Such differences may account for the differing phosphate-removing capabilities of the two activated sludge communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lane, D. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,190
Archaea in coastal marine environments.
DeLong, E. F. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5685 · Cited by 2,725
Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton
Giovannoni, S. J., Britschgi, T. B., Moyer, C. L., & Field, K. G. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345060a0 · Cited by 1,653
The ribosomal database project
Larsen, N., Olsen, G. J., Maidak, B. L., McCaughey, M. J., Overbeek, R., Macke, T. J., Marsh, T. L., & Woese, C. R. (1993) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/21.13.3021 · Cited by 1,520
Phylogenetic diversity of aggregate‐attached vs. free‐living marine bacterial assemblages
DeLong, E. F., Franks, D. G., & Alldredge, A. L. (1993) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1993.38.5.0924 · Cited by 1,069
The Analysis of Natural Microbial Populations by Ribosomal RNA Sequences
Pace, N. R., Stahl, D. A., Lane, D. J., & Olsen, G. J. (1986) · Advances in Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0611-6_1 · Cited by 919
Analysis of a marine picoplankton community by 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing
Schmidt, T. M., DeLong, E. F., & Pace, N. R. (1991) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.173.14.4371-4378.1991 · Cited by 844
Wagner, M., Erhart, R., Manz, W., Amann, R., Lemmer, H., Wedi, D., & Schleifer, K. H. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.3.792-800.1994 · Cited by 540
The phylogeny of purple bacteria: The alpha subdivision
Woese, C. R., Stackebrandt, E., Weisburg, W. G., Paster, B. J., Madigan, M. T., Fowler, V. J., Hahn, C. M., Blanz, P., Gupta, R., Nealson, K. H., et al. (1984) · Systematic and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0723-2020(84)80034-x · Cited by 528
Fuhs, G. W., & Chen, M. (1975) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02010434 · Cited by 489
Cited by
The human microbiome: Our second genome
Grice, E. A., & Segre, J. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163814 · Cited by 759
The Microbiome and Human Biology
Knight, R., Callewaert, C., Marotz, C., Hyde, E. R., Debelius, J. W., McDonald, D., & Sogin, M. L. (2017) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022438 · Cited by 373
Integration of Microbial Ecology and Statistics: a Test To Compare Gene Libraries
Schloss, P. D., Larget, B. R., & Handelsman, J. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.9.5485-5492.2004 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Bond, P. L., Hugenholtz, P., Keller, J., & Blackall, L. L.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1910-1916
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2115263958
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 23.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial community structures of phosphate-removing and non-phosphate-removing activated sludges from sequencing batch reactors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.61.5.1910-1916.1995
- The paper
- Bond, P. L., Hugenholtz, P., Keller, J., & Blackall, L. L. (1995). Bacterial community structures of phosphate-removing and non-phosphate-removing activated sludges from sequencing batch reactors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.5.1910-1916.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
