The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogenetic diversity of the intestinal bacterial community in the termite Reticulitermes speratus
Open accessAbstract
The phylogenetic diversity of the intestinal microflora of a lower termite, Reticulitermes speratus, was examined by a strategy which does not rely on cultivation of the resident microorganisms. Small-subunit rRNA genes (16S rDNAs) were directly amplified from the mixed-population DNA of the termite gut by the PCR and were clonally isolated. Analysis of partial 16S rDNA sequences showed the existence of well-characterized genera as well as the presence of bacterial species for which no 16S rDNA sequence data are available. Of 55 clones sequenced, 45 were phylogenetically affiliated with four of the major groups of the domain Bacteria: the Proteobacteria, the spirochete group, the Bacteroides group, and the low-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria. Within the Proteobacteria, the 16S rDNA clones showed a close relationship to those of cultivated species of enteric bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria, while the 16S rDNA clones in the remaining three groups showed only distant relationships to those of known organisms in these groups. Of the remaining 10 clones, among which 8 clones formed a cluster, there was only very low sequence similarity to known 16S rRNA sequences. None of these clones were affiliated with any of the major groups within the domain Bacteria. The 16S rDNA gene sequence data show that the majority of the intestinal microflora of R. speratus consists of new, uncultured species previously unknown to microbiologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Uncultured Microbial Majority
Rappé, M. S., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759 · Cited by 2,017
Hayashi, H., Sakamoto, M., & Benno, Y. (2002) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2002.tb02731.x · Cited by 455
Acetogenesis from H 2 Plus CO 2 by Spirochetes from Termite Guts
Leadbetter, J. R., Schmidt, T. M., Graber, J. R., & Breznak, J. A. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5402.686 · Cited by 316
Hongoh, Y., Deevong, P., Inoue, T., Moriya, S., Trakulnaleamsai, S., Ohkuma, M., Vongkaluang, C., Noparatnaraporn, N., & Kudo, T. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.11.6590-6599.2005 · Cited by 309
Self-citationCox, C. R., & Gilmore, M. S. (2007) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01496-06 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohkuma, M., & Kudo, T.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 461-468
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2120643571
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic diversity of the intestinal bacterial community in the termite Reticulitermes speratus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.62.2.461-468.1996
- The paper
- Ohkuma, M., & Kudo, T. (1996). Phylogenetic diversity of the intestinal bacterial community in the termite Reticulitermes speratus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.2.461-468.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.