Nitrate-reducing bacteria on rat tongues
Open accessAbstract
Nitrite-producing bacteria (NPB) were isolated from tongues of laboratory rats. The most commonly found nitrite-producing organism was Staphylococcus sciuri, followed by Staphylococcus intermedius, Pasteurella spp., and finally Streptococcus spp. Both morphometric quantification of bacteria on tongue sections and enumeration of culturable bacteria (CFU) showed an increase in the density of bacteria towards the posterior tongue. Up to 65% of bacteria were located in the deep clefts on the posterior tongue. The proportion of culturable NPB in the total culturable microbial population increased from 6% (10(5) CFU cm-2) on the anterior tongue to 65% (10(7) CFU cm-2) on the posterior tongue. Different species compositions of NPB were found on different tongue sections with S. intermedius populations decreasing and S. sciuri and Pasteurella populations increasing towards the posterior tongue. Nitrite production was sensitive to oxygen, and significant nitrite production was only detected on the posterior tongue where the majority of bacteria are situated in deep clefts in the tongue surface. This study suggests the importance of bacteria in nitrite production, from nitrate, on the tongue. Nitrite produced on the tongue may subsequently form nitric oxide in the acidic environment of the stomach. Because of the antimicrobial properties of nitric oxide, a key role for nitrate-reducing tongue bacteria in host animal defense against food-borne pathogens in proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human nitrate reduction is highly dependent on oral commensal bacteria because human cells do not convert nitrate to nitrite to a high degree.
“Human nitrate reduction is highly dependent on the oral commensal bacteria because our cells do not convert nitrate to nitrite to a high degree.”
From Nitrate-Nitrite-Nitric Oxide Pathway: Implications for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (2010) · cites this paper as [50]
The bulk of physiologically relevant nitrate reduction occurs via the activity of facultative anaerobic bacteria dwelling in crypts of the posterior dorsum of the tongue.
“The bulk of physiologically relevant nitrate reduction occurs via the activity of facultative anaerobic bacteria dwelling in crypts of the posterior dorsum of the tongue[81,200,201].”
From Enterosalivary nitrate metabolism and the microbiome: Intersection of microbial metabolism, nitric oxide and diet in cardiac and pulmonary vascular health (2017) · cites this paper as [200]
In both rat and human studies, species of Firmicutes (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and Veillonella) and Actinobacteria (Actinomyces) have been most frequently identified as among the highest nitrate-reducers, while numerous other taxa have also been identified.
“In both rat and human studies species of Firmicutes (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and Veillonella) and Actinobacteria (Actinomyces) have been most frequently identified as among the highest nitrate-reducers, while numerous other taxa have also been identified, including Pasteurella, Rothia, Neisseria, Haemophilus, Granulicatella, etc.[190,200–204].”
From Enterosalivary nitrate metabolism and the microbiome: Intersection of microbial metabolism, nitric oxide and diet in cardiac and pulmonary vascular health (2017) · cites this paper as [200]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Li, H., Duncan, C., Townend, J., Killham, K., Smith, L. M., Johnston, P., Dykhuizen, R., Kelly, D., Golden, M., Benjamin, N., & Leifert, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 924-930
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- PMC
- PMC168385
- OpenAlex
- W1497814715
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Keywords
- nitrate-reducing bacteria, nitrite production, tongue microbiota, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus intermedius, Pasteurella, Streptococcus, oxygen sensitivity, nitric oxide, rat tongue
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Male, Nitrates, Nitrites, Oxidation-Reduction, Tongue, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review