The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elemental Sulfur and Thiosulfate Disproportionation by Desulfocapsa sulfoexigens sp. nov., a New Anaerobic Bacterium Isolated from Marine Surface Sediment
Open accessAbstract
A mesophilic, anaerobic, gram-negative bacterium, strain SB164P1, was enriched and isolated from oxidized marine surface sediment with elemental sulfur as the sole energy substrate in the presence of ferrihydrite. Elemental sulfur was disproportionated to hydrogen sulfide and sulfate. Growth was observed exclusively in the presence of a hydrogen sulfide scavenger, e.g., ferrihydrite. In the absence of a scavenger, sulfide and sulfate production were observed but no growth occurred. Strain SB164P1 grew also by disproportionation of thiosulfate and sulfite. With thiosulfate, the growth efficiency was higher in ferrihydrite-supplemented media than in media without ferrihydrite. Growth coupled to sulfate reduction was not observed. However, a slight sulfide production occurred in cultures incubated with formate and sulfate. Strain SB164P1 is the first bacterium described that grows chemolithoautotrophically exclusively by the disproportionation of inorganic sulfur compounds. Comparative 16S rDNA sequencing analysis placed strain SB164P1 into the delta subclass of the class Proteobacteria . Its closest relative is Desulfocapsa thiozymogenes , and slightly more distantly related are Desulfofustis glycolicus and Desulforhopalus vacuolatus . This phylogenetic cluster of organisms, together with members of the genus Desulfobulbus , forms one of the main lines of descent within the delta subclass of the Proteobacteria . Due to the common phenotypic characteristics and the phylogenetic relatedness to Desulfocapsa thiozymogenes , we propose that strain SB164P1 be designated the type strain of Desulfocapsa sulfoexigens sp. nov.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Biogeochemical Sulfur Cycle of Marine Sediments
Jørgensen, B. B., Findlay, A. J., & Pellerin, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00849 · Cited by 784
Energetics of overall metabolic reactions of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic Archaea and Bacteria
Amend, J. (2001) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00062-0 · Cited by 783
Biogeochemistry of Sulfur Isotopes
Canfield, D. E. (2001) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607 · Cited by 718
Harnessing microbially generated power on the seafloor
Tender, L. M., Reimers, C. E., Stecher, H. A., Holmes, D. E., Bond, D. R., Lowy, D. A., Pilobello, K., Fertig, S. J., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt716 · Cited by 718
The Neoproterozoic oxygenation event: Environmental perturbations and biogeochemical cycling
Och, L. M., & Shields-Zhou, G. A. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.09.004 · Cited by 646
Metadata
- Authors
- Finster, K., Liesack, W., & Thamdrup, B.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-125
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1489050717
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elemental Sulfur and Thiosulfate Disproportionation by Desulfocapsa sulfoexigens sp. nov., a New Anaerobic Bacterium Isolated from Marine Surface Sediment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.1.119-125.1998
- The paper
- Finster, K., Liesack, W., & Thamdrup, B. (1998). Elemental Sulfur and Thiosulfate Disproportionation by Desulfocapsa sulfoexigens sp. nov., a New Anaerobic Bacterium Isolated from Marine Surface Sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.1.119-125.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.