The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Metal-Rich Sludge Amendments on the Soil Microbial Community
Open accessAbstract
The effects of heavy-metal-containing sewage sludge on the soil microbial community were studied in two agricultural soils of different textures, which had been contaminated separately with three predominantly single metals (Cu, Zn, and Ni) at two different levels more than 20 years ago. We compared three community-based microbiological measurements, namely, phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis to reveal changes in species composition, the Biolog system to indicate metabolic fingerprints of microbial communities, and the thymidine incorporation technique to measure bacterial community tolerance. In the Luddington soil, bacterial community tolerance increased in all metal treatments compared to an unpolluted-sludge-treated control soil. Community tolerance to specific metals increased the most when the same metal was added to the soil; for example, tolerance to Cu increased most in Cu-polluted treatments. A dose-response effect was also evident. There were also indications of cotolerance to metals whose concentration had not been elevated by the sludge treatment. The PLFA pattern changed in all metal treatments, but the interpretation was complicated by the soil moisture content, which also affected the results. The Biolog measurements indicated similar effects of metals and moisture to the PLFA measurements, but due to high variation between replicates, no significant differences compared to the uncontaminated control were found. In the Lee Valley soil, significant increases in community tolerance were found for the high levels of Cu and Zn, while the PLFA pattern was significantly altered for the soils with high levels of Cu, Ni, and Zn. No effects on the Biolog measurements were found in this soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community
Griffiths, B. S., & Philippot, L. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00343.x · Cited by 1,117
Campbell, C. D., Chapman, S. J., Cameron, C. M., Davidson, M. S., & Potts, J. M. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.6.3593-3599.2003 · Cited by 854
Self-citationHigh throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils
Buyer, J. S., & Sasser, M. (2012) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.06.005 · Cited by 511
(2014) · Cited by 433
Grayston, S. J., Campbell, C. D., Bardgett, R. D., Mawdsley, J. L., Clegg, C. D., Ritz, K., Griffiths, B. S., Rodwell, J. S., Edwards, S. J., Davies, W. J., et al. (2004) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(03)00098-2 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bååth, E., Díaz-Raviña, M., Frostegård, Å., & Campbell, C. D.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 238-245
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2159308156
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Metal-Rich Sludge Amendments on the Soil Microbial Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.1.238-245.1998
- The paper
- Bååth, E., Díaz-Raviña, M., Frostegård, Å., & Campbell, C. D. (1998). Effect of Metal-Rich Sludge Amendments on the Soil Microbial Community. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.1.238-245.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.