The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competitive Dominance among Strains of Luminous Bacteria Provides an Unusual Form of Evidence for Parallel Evolution in Sepiolid Squid-Vibrio Symbioses
Open accessAbstract
One of the principal assumptions in symbiosis research is that associated partners have evolved in parallel. We report here experimental evidence for parallel speciation patterns among several partners of the sepiolid squid-luminous bacterial symbioses. Molecular phylogenies for 14 species of host squids were derived from sequences of both the nuclear internal transcribed spacer region and the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I; the glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase locus was sequenced for phylogenetic determinations of 7 strains of bacterial symbionts. Comparisons of trees constructed for each of the three loci revealed a parallel phylogeny between the sepiolids and their respective symbionts. Because both the squids and their bacterial partners can be easily cultured independently in the laboratory, we were able to couple these phylogenetic analyses with experiments to examine the ability of the different symbiont strains to compete with each other during the colonization of one of the host species. Our results not only indicate a pronounced dominance of native symbiont strains over nonnative strains, but also reveal a hierarchy of symbiont competency that reflects the phylogenetic relationships of the partners. For the first time, molecular systematics has been coupled with experimental colonization assays to provide evidence for the existence of parallel speciation among a set of animal-bacterial associations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A complex journey: transmission of microbial symbionts.
Bright, M., & Bulgheresi, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2262 · Cited by 894
Haddock, S. H. D., Moline, M. A., & Case, J. F. (2010) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081028 · Cited by 849
Gut Microbiotas and Host Evolution: Scaling Up Symbiosis
Shapira, M. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.006 · Cited by 448
Visick, K. L., Foster, J., Doino, J., McFall-Ngai, M., & Ruby, E. G. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.16.4578-4586.2000 · Cited by 357
Self-citationWhy bacteria matter in animal development and evolution
Fraune, S., & Bosch, T. C. G. (2010) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.200900192 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Nishiguchi, M. K., Ruby, E. G., & McFall-Ngai, M. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3209-3213
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1669725141
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competitive Dominance among Strains of Luminous Bacteria Provides an Unusual Form of Evidence for Parallel Evolution in Sepiolid Squid-Vibrio Symbioses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.9.3209-3213.1998
- The paper
- Nishiguchi, M. K., Ruby, E. G., & McFall-Ngai, M. J. (1998). Competitive Dominance among Strains of Luminous Bacteria Provides an Unusual Form of Evidence for Parallel Evolution in Sepiolid Squid-Vibrio Symbioses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.9.3209-3213.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.