The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct Determination of Carbon and Nitrogen Contents of Natural Bacterial Assemblages in Marine Environments
Open accessAbstract
In order to better estimate bacterial biomass in marine environments, we developed a novel technique for direct measurement of carbon and nitrogen contents of natural bacterial assemblages. Bacterial cells were separated from phytoplankton and detritus with glass fiber and membrane filters (pore size, 0.8 μm) and then concentrated by tangential flow filtration. The concentrate was used for the determination of amounts of organic carbon and nitrogen by a high-temperature catalytic oxidation method, and after it was stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, cell abundance was determined by epifluorescence microscopy. We found that the average contents of carbon and nitrogen for oceanic bacterial assemblages were 12.4 ± 6.3 and 2.1 ± 1.1 fg cell −1 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 6), respectively. Corresponding values for coastal bacterial assemblages were 30.2 ± 12.3 fg of C cell −1 and 5.8 ± 1.5 fg of N cell −1 ( n = 5), significantly higher than those for oceanic bacteria (two-tailed Student’s t test; P < 0.03). There was no significant difference ( P > 0.2) in the bacterial C:N ratio (atom atom −1 ) between oceanic (6.8 ± 1.2) and coastal (5.9 ± 1.1) assemblages. Our estimates support the previous proposition that bacteria contribute substantially to total biomass in marine environments, but they also suggest that the use of a single conversion factor for diverse marine environments can lead to large errors in assessing the role of bacteria in food webs and biogeochemical cycles. The use of a factor, 20 fg of C cell −1 , which has been widely adopted in recent studies may result in the overestimation (by as much as 330%) of bacterial biomass in open oceans and in the underestimation (by as much as 40%) of bacterial biomass in coastal environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The biomass distribution on Earth
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115 · Cited by 3,723
Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory- and field-based investigations
Lever, M. A., Rogers, K. L., Lloyd, K. G., Overmann, J., Schink, B., Thauer, R. K., Hoehler, T. M., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv020 · Cited by 378
Vrede, K., Heldal, M., Norland, S., & Bratbak, G. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.6.2965-2971.2002 · Cited by 331
Growth Rates of Microbes in the Oceans
Kirchman, D. L. (2016) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033938 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Fukuda, R., Ogawa, H., Nagata, T., & Koike, I.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3352-3358
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2117656543
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct Determination of Carbon and Nitrogen Contents of Natural Bacterial Assemblages in Marine Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.9.3352-3358.1998
- The paper
- Fukuda, R., Ogawa, H., Nagata, T., & Koike, I. (1998). Direct Determination of Carbon and Nitrogen Contents of Natural Bacterial Assemblages in Marine Environments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.9.3352-3358.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.