The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significance of Size and Nucleic Acid Content Heterogeneity as Measured by Flow Cytometry in Natural Planktonic Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Total bacterial abundances estimated with different epifluorescence microscopy methods (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole [DAPI], SYBR Green, and Live/Dead) and with flow cytometry (Syto13) showed good correspondence throughout two microcosm experiments with coastal Mediterranean water. In the Syto13-stained samples we could differentiate bacteria with apparent high DNA (HDNA) content and bacteria with apparent low DNA (LDNA) content. HDNA bacteria, “live” bacteria (determined as such with the Molecular Probes Live/Dead Bac Light bacterial viability kit), and nucleoid-containing bacteria (NuCC) comprised similar fractions of the total bacterial community. Similarly, LDNA bacteria and “dead” bacteria (determined with the kit) comprised a similar fraction of the total bacterial community in one of the experiments. The rates of change of each type of bacteria during the microcosm experiments were also positively correlated between methods. In various experiments where predator pressure on bacteria had been reduced, we detected growth of the HDNA bacteria without concomitant growth of the LDNA bacteria, such that the percentage contribution of HDNA bacteria to total bacterial numbers (%HDNA) increased. This indicates that the HDNA bacteria are the dynamic members of the bacterial assemblage. Given how quickly and easily the numbers of HDNA and LDNA bacteria can be obtained, and given the similarity to the numbers of “live” cells and NuCC, the %HDNA is suggested as a reference value for the percentage of actively growing bacteria in marine planktonic environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biomass distribution in marine planktonic communities
Gasol, J. M., del Giorgio, P. A., & Duarte, C. M. (1997) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1353 · Cited by 391
Cited by
Xenobiotics shape the physiology and gene expression of the active human gut microbiome
Maurice, C. F., Haiser, H. J., & Turnbaugh, P. J. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.052 · Cited by 811
Hammes, F., Berney, M., Wang, Y., Vital, M., Köster, O., & Egli, T. (2008) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.009 · Cited by 586
Prest, E. I., Hammes, F., Kötzsch, S., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Vrouwenvelder, J. S. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.051 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Gasol, J. M., Zweifel, U. L., Peters, F., Fuhrman, J. A., & Hagström, Å.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4475-4483
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2155927856
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of Size and Nucleic Acid Content Heterogeneity as Measured by Flow Cytometry in Natural Planktonic Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.10.4475-4483.1999
- The paper
- Gasol, J. M., Zweifel, U. L., Peters, F., Fuhrman, J. A., & Hagström, Å. (1999). Significance of Size and Nucleic Acid Content Heterogeneity as Measured by Flow Cytometry in Natural Planktonic Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.10.4475-4483.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.