The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wide Distribution and Diversity of Members of the Bacterial Kingdom Acidobacterium in the Environment
Open accessAbstract
To assess the distribution and diversity of members of the recently identified bacterial kingdom Acidobacterium , members of this kingdom present in 43 environmental samples were surveyed by PCR amplification. A primer designed to amplify rRNA gene sequences (ribosomal DNAs [rDNAs]) from most known members of the kingdom was used to interrogate bulk DNA extracted from the samples. Positive PCR results were obtained with all temperate soil and sediment samples tested, as well as some hot spring samples, indicating that members of this kingdom are very widespread in terrestrial environments. PCR primers specific for four phylogenetic subgroups within the kingdom were used in similar surveys. All four subgroups were detected in most neutral soils and some sediments, while only two of the groups were seen in most low-pH environments. The combined use of these primers allowed identification of a novel lineage within the kingdom in a hot spring environment. Phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequences from our survey and the literature outlines at least six major subgroups within the kingdom. Taken together, these data suggest that members of the Acidobacterium kingdom are as genetically and metabolically diverse, environmentally widespread and perhaps as ecologically important as the well-known Proteobacteria and gram-positive bacterial kingdoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Cited by
The Uncultured Microbial Majority
Rappé, M. S., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759 · Cited by 2,017
Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology
Radajewski, S., Ineson, P., Parekh, N. R., & Murrell, J. C. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001054 · Cited by 1,252
Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.127 · Cited by 1,230
The ecology of Acidobacteria: moving beyond genes and genomes
Kielak, A. M., Barreto, C. C., Kowalchuk, G. A., van Veen, J. A., & Kuramae, E. E. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00744 · Cited by 1,033
Dunbar, J., Ticknor, L. O., & Kuske, C. R. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.1.190-197.2001 · Cited by 561
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barns, S. M., Takala, S. L., & Kuske, C. R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1731-1737
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2128596072
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wide Distribution and Diversity of Members of the Bacterial Kingdom Acidobacterium in the Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.4.1731-1737.1999
- The paper
- Barns, S. M., Takala, S. L., & Kuske, C. R. (1999). Wide Distribution and Diversity of Members of the Bacterial Kingdom Acidobacterium in the Environment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.4.1731-1737.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.