The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Numerical Analysis of Grassland Bacterial Community Structure under Different Land Management Regimens by Using 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Data and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Banding Patterns
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial diversity in unimproved and improved grassland soils was assessed by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from directly extracted soil DNA, followed by sequencing of ∼45 16S rDNA clones from each of three unimproved and three improved grassland samples (A. E. McCaig, L. A. Glover, and J. I. Prosser, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1721–1730, 1999) or by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of total amplification products. Semi-improved grassland soils were analyzed only by DGGE. No differences between communities were detected by calculation of diversity indices and similarity coefficients for clone data (possibly due to poor coverage). Differences were not observed between the diversities of individual unimproved and improved grassland DGGE profiles, although considerable spatial variation was observed among triplicate samples. Semi-improved grassland samples, however, were less diverse than the other grassland samples and had much lower within-group variation. DGGE banding profiles obtained from triplicate samples pooled prior to analysis indicated that there was less evenness in improved soils, suggesting that selection for specific bacterial groups occurred. Analysis of DGGE profiles by canonical variate analysis but not by principal-coordinate analysis, using unweighted data (considering only the presence and absence of bands) and weighted data (considering the relative intensity of each band), demonstrated that there were clear differences between grasslands, and the results were not affected by weighting of data. This study demonstrated that quantitative analysis of data obtained by community profiling methods, such as DGGE, can reveal differences between complex microbial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
SIMPSON, E. H. (1949) · Nature · doi:10.1038/163688a0 · Cited by 14,164
Muyzer, G., de Waal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 · Cited by 11,429
The Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W., & Wiener, N. (1950) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3067010 · Cited by 9,801
The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections
Pielou, E. C. (1966) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0 · Cited by 5,903
Liu, W. T., Marsh, T. L., Cheng, H., & Forney, L. J. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.11.4516-4522.1997 · Cited by 2,251
Heuer, H., Krsek, M., Baker, P., Smalla, K., & Wellington, E. M. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.8.3233-3241.1997 · Cited by 1,656
Kowalchuk, G. A., Stephen, J. R., De Boer, W., Prosser, J. I., Embley, T. M., & Woldendorp, J. W. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.4.1489-1497.1997 · Cited by 800
Self-citationBorneman, J., & Triplett, E. W. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.7.2647-2653.1997 · Cited by 701
Schwieger, F., & Tebbe, C. C. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.12.4870-4876.1998 · Cited by 690
Cited by
Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00335-09 · Cited by 4,063
Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities
Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., & Fierer, N. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.119 · Cited by 3,044
Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems
Torsvik, V., & Øvreås, L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00324-7 · Cited by 1,922
Garbeva, P., van Veen, J. A., & van Elsas, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455 · Cited by 1,458
Tourna, M., Freitag, T. E., Nicol, G. W., & Prosser, J. I. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01563.x · Cited by 773
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McCaig, A. E., Glover, L. A., & Prosser, J. I.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4554-4559
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2082898027
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 15.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical Analysis of Grassland Bacterial Community Structure under Different Land Management Regimens by Using 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Data and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Banding Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.10.4554-4559.2001
- The paper
- McCaig, A. E., Glover, L. A., & Prosser, J. I. (2001). Numerical Analysis of Grassland Bacterial Community Structure under Different Land Management Regimens by Using 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Data and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Banding Patterns. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.10.4554-4559.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.