The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Survival of Salmonellae on and in Tomato Plants from the Time of Inoculation at Flowering and Early Stages of Fruit Development through Fruit Ripening
Open accessAbstract
The fate of salmonellae applied to tomato plants was investigated. Five Salmonella serotypes were used to inoculate tomato plants before and after fruits set, either by injecting stems with inoculum or brushing flowers with it. Ripe tomato fruits were subjected to microbiological analysis. Peptone wash water, homogenates of stem scar tissues, and homogenates of fruit pulp were serially diluted and plated on bismuth sulfite agar before and after enrichment. Presumptive Salmonella colonies were confirmed by serological tests, PCR assay using HILA2 primers, and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR. Of 30 tomatoes harvested from inoculated plants, 11 (37%) were positive for Salmonella . Of the Salmonella -positive tomatoes, 43 and 40%, respectively, were from plants receiving stem inoculation before and after flower set. Two of eight tomatoes produced from inoculated flowers contained Salmonella . Higher percentages of surface (82%) and stem scar tissue (73%) samples, compared to pulp of Salmonella -positive tomatoes (55%), harbored the pathogen. Of the five serotypes in the inoculum, Montevideo was the most persistent, being isolated from tomatoes 49 days after inoculation, and Poona was the most dominant, being present in 5 of 11 Salmonella- positive tomatoes. Results suggest that Salmonella cells survive in or on tomato fruits from the time of inoculation at flowering through fruit ripening. Tomato stems and flowers are possible sites at which Salmonella may attach and remain viable during fruit development, thus serving as routes or reservoirs for contaminating ripened fruit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fresh fruit and vegetables as vehicles for the transmission of human pathogens
Berger, C. N., Sodha, S. V., Shaw, R. K., Griffin, P. M., Pink, D., Hand, P., & Frankel, G. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02297.x · Cited by 889
The growing burden of foodborne outbreaks due to contaminated fresh produce: risks and opportunities
LYNCH, M. F., TAUXE, R. V., & HEDBERG, C. W. (2009) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268808001969 · Cited by 803
Role of Nonhost Environments in the Lifestyles of Salmonella and Escherichia coli
Winfield, M. D., & Groisman, E. A. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.7.3687-3694.2003 · Cited by 732
Eichert, T., Kurtz, A., Steiner, U., & Goldbach, H. E. (2008) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01135.x · Cited by 709
Alegbeleye, O. O., Singleton, I., & Sant’Ana, A. S. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, X., Chen, J., Brackett, R. E., & Beuchat, L. R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4760-4764
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1987835005
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival of Salmonellae on and in Tomato Plants from the Time of Inoculation at Flowering and Early Stages of Fruit Development through Fruit Ripening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.10.4760-4764.2001
- The paper
- Guo, X., Chen, J., Brackett, R. E., & Beuchat, L. R. (2001). Survival of Salmonellae on and in Tomato Plants from the Time of Inoculation at Flowering and Early Stages of Fruit Development through Fruit Ripening. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.10.4760-4764.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.