The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selection of Specific Endophytic Bacterial Genotypes by Plants in Response to Soil Contamination
Open accessAbstract
Plant-bacterial combinations can increase contaminant degradation in the rhizosphere, but the role played by indigenous root-associated bacteria during plant growth in contaminated soils is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if plants had the ability to selectively enhance the prevalence of endophytes containing pollutant catabolic genes in unrelated environments contaminated with different pollutants. At petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sites, two genes encoding hydrocarbon degradation, alkane monooxygenase ( alkB ) and naphthalene dioxygenase ( ndoB ), were two and four times more prevalent in bacteria extracted from the root interior (endophytic) than from the bulk soil and sediment, respectively. In field sites contaminated with nitroaromatics, two genes encoding nitrotoluene degradation, 2-nitrotoluene reductase ( ntdAa ) and nitrotoluene monooxygenase ( ntnM ), were 7 to 14 times more prevalent in endophytic bacteria. The addition of petroleum to sediment doubled the prevalence of ndoB -positive endophytes in Scirpus pungens , indicating that the numbers of endophytes containing catabolic genotypes were dependent on the presence and concentration of contaminants. Similarly, the numbers of alkB - or ndoB -positive endophytes in Festuca arundinacea were correlated with the concentration of creosote in the soil but not with the numbers of alkB - or ndoB -positive bacteria in the bulk soil. Our results indicate that the enrichment of catabolic genotypes in the root interior is both plant and contaminant dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diversity of Alkane Hydroxylase Systems in the Environment
Van Beilen, J. B., Li, Z., Duetz, W. A., Smits, T. H. M., & Witholt, B. (2003) · Oil & Gas Science and Technology · doi:10.2516/ogst:2003026 · Cited by 375
Advances in Rhizobium Research
Sessitsch, A., Howieson, J. G., Perret, X., Antoun, H., & Martínez-Romero, E. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/0735-260291044278 · Cited by 323
Hoang, S. A., Lamb, D., Seshadri, B., Sarkar, B., Choppala, G., Kirkham, M. B., & Bolan, N. S. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123282 · Cited by 189
Chen, Y., Ding, Q., Chao, Y., Wei, X., Wang, S., & Qiu, R. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.095 · Cited by 91
Groundwater remediation and the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation
Compernolle, T., Van Passel, S., Weyens, N., Vangronsveld, J., Lebbe, L., & Thewys, T. (2012) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2011.628879 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Siciliano, S. D., Fortin, N., Mihoc, A., Wisse, G., Labelle, S., Beaumier, D., Ouellette, D., Roy, R., Whyte, L. G., Banks, M. K., Schwab, P., Lee, K., & Greer, C. W.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2469-2475
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2146477624
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of Specific Endophytic Bacterial Genotypes by Plants in Response to Soil Contamination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.6.2469-2475.2001
- The paper
- Siciliano, S. D., Fortin, N., Mihoc, A., Wisse, G., Labelle, S., Beaumier, D., Ouellette, D., Roy, R., Whyte, L. G., Banks, M. K., Schwab, P., Lee, K., & Greer, C. W. (2001). Selection of Specific Endophytic Bacterial Genotypes by Plants in Response to Soil Contamination. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.6.2469-2475.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.