The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proteomic Analysis Reveals Differential Protein Expression by Bacillus cereus during Biofilm Formation
Open accessAbstract
Bacillus cereus , a dairy-associated toxigenic bacterium, readily forms biofilms on various surfaces and was used to gain a better understanding of biofilm development by gram-positive aerobic rods. B. cereus DL5 was shown to readily adapt to an attached mode of growth, with dense biofilm structures developing within 18 h after inoculation when glass wool was used as a surface. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) revealed distinct and reproducible phenotypic differences between 2- and 18-h-old biofilm and planktonic cells (grown both in the presence and in the absence of glass wool). Whereas the 2-h-old biofilm proteome indicated expression of 15 unique proteins, the 18-h-old biofilm proteome contained 7 uniquely expressed proteins. Differences between the microcolony (2-h) proteome and the more developed biofilm (18-h) proteome were largely due to up- and down-regulation of the expression of a multitude of proteins. Selected protein spots excised from 2DE gels were subjected to N-terminal sequencing and identified with high confidence. Among the proteins were catabolic ornithine carbamoyltransferase and l -lactate dehydrogenase. Interestingly, increased levels of YhbH, a member of the sigma 54 modulation protein family which is strongly induced in response to environmental stresses and energy depletion via both σ B and σ H , could be observed within 2 h in both attached cells and planktonic cultures growing in the presence of glass wool, indicating that this protein plays an important role in regulation of the biofilm phenotype. Distinct band differences were also found between the extracellular proteins of 18-h-old cultures grown in the presence and in the absence of glass wool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chandra, J., Kuhn, D. M., Mukherjee, P. K., Hoyer, L. L., McCormick, T., & Ghannoum, M. A. (2001) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.183.18.5385-5394.2001 · Cited by 1,578
Regulation of Carbon Catabolism in Bacillus Species
Stülke, J., & Hillen, W. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.849 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Genomics of the group of organisms
RASKO, D., ALTHERR, M., HAN, C., & RAVEL, J. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.005 · Cited by 470
Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications
Bhadury, P., & Wright, P. (2004) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1307-5 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Oosthuizen, M. C., Steyn, B., Theron, J., Cosette, P., Lindsay, D., von Holy, A., & Brözel, V. S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2770-2780
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2113835956
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic Analysis Reveals Differential Protein Expression by Bacillus cereus during Biofilm Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.68.6.2770-2780.2002
- The paper
- Oosthuizen, M. C., Steyn, B., Theron, J., Cosette, P., Lindsay, D., von Holy, A., & Brözel, V. S. (2002). Proteomic Analysis Reveals Differential Protein Expression by Bacillus cereus during Biofilm Formation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.6.2770-2780.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.