The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanisms and Rates of Bacterial Colonization of Sinking Aggregates
Open accessAbstract
Quantifying the rate at which bacteria colonize aggregates is a key to understanding microbial turnover of aggregates. We used encounter models based on random walk and advection-diffusion considerations to predict colonization rates from the bacteria's motility patterns (swimming speed, tumbling frequency, and turn angles) and the hydrodynamic environment (stationary versus sinking aggregates). We then experimentally tested the models with 10 strains of bacteria isolated from marine particles: two strains were nonmotile; the rest were swimming at 20 to 60 μm s −1 with different tumbling frequency (0 to 2 s −1 ). The rates at which these bacteria colonized artificial aggregates (stationary and sinking) largely agreed with model predictions. We report several findings. (i) Motile bacteria rapidly colonize aggregates, whereas nonmotile bacteria do not. (ii) Flow enhances colonization rates. (iii) Tumbling strains colonize aggregates enriched with organic substrates faster than unenriched aggregates, while a nontumbling strain did not. (iv) Once on the aggregates, the bacteria may detach and typical residence time is about 3 h. Thus, there is a rapid exchange between attached and free bacteria. (v) With the motility patterns observed, freely swimming bacteria will encounter an aggregate in <1 day at typical upper-ocean aggregate concentrations. This is faster than even starving bacteria burn up their reserves, and bacteria may therefore rely solely on aggregates for food. (vi) The net result of colonization and detachment leads to a predicted equilibrium abundance of attached bacteria as a function of aggregate size, which is markedly different from field observations. This discrepancy suggests that inter- and intraspecific interactions among bacteria and between bacteria and their predators may be more important than colonization in governing the population dynamics of bacteria on natural aggregates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial interactions lead to rapid micro-scale successions on model marine particles
Datta, M. S., Sliwerska, E., Gore, J., Polz, M. F., & Cordero, O. X. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11965 · Cited by 432
The microbial loop – 25 years later
Fenchel, T. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.013 · Cited by 353
Understanding microbial community dynamics to improve optimal microbiome selection
Wright, R. J., Gibson, M. I., & Christie-Oleza, J. A. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0702-x · Cited by 341
Mesopelagic zone ecology and biogeochemistry – a synthesis
Robinson, C., Steinberg, D. K., Anderson, T. R., Arístegui, J., Carlson, C. A., Frost, J. R., Ghiglione, J.-F., Hernández-León, S., Jackson, G. A., Koppelmann, R., et al. (2010) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.02.018 · Cited by 324
The ecological roles of bacterial chemotaxis
Keegstra, J. M., Carrara, F., & Stocker, R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00709-w · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiørboe, T., Grossart, H.-P., Ploug, H., & Tang, K.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3996-4006
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2169902378
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms and Rates of Bacterial Colonization of Sinking Aggregates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.68.8.3996-4006.2002
- The paper
- Kiørboe, T., Grossart, H.-P., Ploug, H., & Tang, K. (2002). Mechanisms and Rates of Bacterial Colonization of Sinking Aggregates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.8.3996-4006.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.