The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elevated Abundance of Bacteriophage Infecting Bacteria in Soil
Open accessAbstract
Here we report the first direct counts of soil bacteriophage and show that substantial populations of these viruses exist in soil (grand mean = 1.5 × 10 7 g−1), at least 350-fold more than the highest numbers estimated from traditional viable plaque counts. Adding pure cultures of a Serratia phage to soil showed that the direct counting methods with electron microscopy developed here underestimated the added phage populations by at least eightfold. So, assuming natural phages were similarly underestimated, virus numbers in soil averaged 1.5 × 10 8 g−1, which is equivalent to 4% of the total population of bacteria. This high abundance was to some extent confirmed by hybridizing colonies grown on Serratia and Pseudomonas selective media with cocktails of phage infecting these bacteria. This showed that 8.9 and 3.9%, respectively, hybridized with colonies from the two media and confirmed the presence of phage DNA sequences in the cultivable fraction of the natural population. Thus, soil phage, like their aquatic counterparts, are likely to be important in controlling bacterial populations and mediating gene transfer in soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 1×
“In view of the large biomass of bacteria in the biosphere (30), our results indicate that predation of bacteria by viruses will be an important factor in controlling and stimulating the growth of bacterial populations in soil.”
Background
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Chee‐Sanford, J. C., Mackie, R. I., Koike, S., Krapac, I. G., Lin, Y., Yannarell, A. C., Maxwell, S., & Aminov, R. I. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0128 · Cited by 830
Elnahal, A. S. M., El-Saadony, M. T., Saad, A. M., Desoky, E.-S. M., El-Tahan, A. M., Rady, M. M., AbuQamar, S. F., & El-Tarabily, K. A. (2022) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/s10658-021-02393-7 · Cited by 482
Wilpiszeski, R. L., Aufrecht, J. A., Retterer, S. T., Sullivan, M. B., Graham, D. E., Pierce, E. M., Zablocki, O. D., Palumbo, A. V., & Elias, D. A. (2019) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00324-19 · Cited by 441
Viruses in Soil Ecosystems: An Unknown Quantity Within an Unexplored Territory
Williamson, K. E., Fuhrmann, J. J., Wommack, K. E., & Radosevich, M. (2017) · Annual Review of Virology · doi:10.1146/annurev-virology-101416-041639 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashelford, K. E., Day, M. J., & Fry, J. C.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 285-289
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2170174366
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elevated Abundance of Bacteriophage Infecting Bacteria in Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.1.285-289.2003
- The paper
- Ashelford, K. E., Day, M. J., & Fry, J. C. (2003). Elevated Abundance of Bacteriophage Infecting Bacteria in Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.1.285-289.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.