The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer
Open accessAbstract
The potential for removing uranium from contaminated groundwater by stimulating the in situ activity of dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganisms was evaluated in a uranium-contaminated aquifer located in Rifle, Colo. Acetate (1 to 3 mM) was injected into the subsurface over a 3-month period via an injection gallery composed of 20 injection wells, which was installed upgradient from a series of 15 monitoring wells. U(VI) concentrations decreased in as little as 9 days after acetate injection was initiated, and within 50 days uranium had declined below the prescribed treatment level of 0.18 μM in some of the monitoring wells. Analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences and phospholipid fatty acid profiles demonstrated that the initial loss of uranium from the groundwater was associated with an enrichment of Geobacter species in the treatment zone. Fe(II) in the groundwater also increased during this period, suggesting that U(VI) reduction was coincident with Fe(III) reduction. As the acetate injection continued over 50 days there was a loss of sulfate from the groundwater and an accumulation of sulfide and the composition of the microbial community changed. Organisms with 16S rDNA sequences most closely related to those of sulfate reducers became predominant, and Geobacter species became a minor component of the community. This apparent switch from Fe(III) reduction to sulfate reduction as the terminal electron accepting process for the oxidation of the injected acetate was associated with an increase in uranium concentration in the groundwater. These results demonstrate that in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater is feasible but suggest that the strategy should be optimized to better maintain long-term activity of Geobacter species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Lovley, D. R., Giovannoni, S. J., White, D. C., Champine, J. E., Phillips, E. J. P., Gorby, Y. A., & Goodwin, S. (1993) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00290916 · Cited by 983
Self-citationReduction of Fe(III) in sediments by sulphate-reducing bacteria
Coleman, M. L., Hedrick, D. B., Lovley, D. R., White, D. C., & Pye, K. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361436a0 · Cited by 479
Self-citationMechanisms for Fe(III) Oxide Reduction in Sedimentary Environments
Nevin, K. P., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Geomicrobiology Journal · doi:10.1080/01490450252864253 · Cited by 330
Self-citation
Cited by
Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) Reduction
Lovley, D. R., Holmes, D. E., & Nevin, K. P. (2004) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(04)49005-5 · Cited by 1,471
Self-citationGenome of Geobacter sulfurreducens: Metal Reduction in Subsurface Environments
Methé, B. A., Nelson, K. E., Eisen, J. A., Paulsen, I. T., Nelson, W., Heidelberg, J. F., Wu, D., Wu, M., Ward, N., Beanan, M. J., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088727 · Cited by 710
Self-citationPhytoremediation of contaminated soils by heavy metals and PAHs. A brief review
Cristaldi, A., Conti, G. O., Jho, E. H., Zuccarello, P., Grasso, A., Copat, C., & Ferrante, M. (2017) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2017.08.002 · Cited by 435
Andersen, M. B., Stirling, C. H., & Weyer, S. (2017) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/rmg.2017.82.19 · Cited by 218
O’Loughlin, E. J., Boyanov, M. I., Flynn, T. M., Gorski, C. A., Hofmann, S. M., McCormick, M. L., Scherer, M. M., & Kemner, K. M. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es400627j · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, R. T., Vrionis, H. A., Ortiz-Bernad, I., Resch, C. T., Long, P. E., Dayvault, R., Karp, K., Marutzky, S., Metzler, D. R., Peacock, A., White, D. C., Lowe, M., & Lovley, D. R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5884-5891
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2103736180
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.10.5884-5891.2003
- The paper
- Anderson, R. T., Vrionis, H. A., Ortiz-Bernad, I., Resch, C. T., Long, P. E., Dayvault, R., Karp, K., Marutzky, S., Metzler, D. R., Peacock, A., White, D. C., Lowe, M., & Lovley, D. R. (2003). Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.10.5884-5891.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.