The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity and Activity of Methanotrophic Bacteria in Different Upland Soils
Open accessAbstract
Samples from diverse upland soils that oxidize atmospheric methane were characterized with regard to methane oxidation activity and the community composition of methanotrophic bacteria (MB). MB were identified on the basis of the detection and comparative sequence analysis of the pmoA gene, which encodes a subunit of particulate methane monooxygenase. MB commonly detected in soils were closely related to Methylocaldum spp., Methylosinus spp., Methylocystis spp., or the “forest sequence cluster” (USC α), which has previously been detected in upland soils and is related to pmoA sequences of type II MB ( Alphaproteobacteria ). As well, a novel group of sequences distantly related (<75% derived amino acid identity) to those of known type I MB (Gammaproteobacteria) was often detected. This novel “upland soil cluster γ” (USC γ) was significantly more likely to be detected in soils with pH values of greater than 6.0 than in more acidic soils. To identify active MB, four selected soils were incubated with 13 CH 4 at low mixing ratios (<50 ppm of volume), and extracted methylated phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) were analyzed by gas chromatography-online combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Incorporation of 13 C into PLFAs characteristic for methanotrophic Gammaproteobacteria was observed in all soils in which USC γ sequences were detected, suggesting that the bacteria possessing these sequences were active methanotrophs. A pattern of labeled PLFAs typical for methanotrophic Alphaproteobacteria was obtained for a sample in which only USC α sequences were detected. The data indicate that different MB are present and active in different soils that oxidize atmospheric methane.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brockett, B. F. T., Prescott, C. E., & Grayston, S. J. (2012) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.003 · Cited by 1,115
Knief, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01346 · Cited by 594
Self-citationAmelung, W., Brodowski, S., Sandhage-Hofmann, A., & Bol, R. (2008) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)00606-8 · Cited by 405
Molecular Ecology Techniques for the Study of Aerobic Methanotrophs
McDonald, I. R., Bodrossy, L., Chen, Y., & Murrell, J. C. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02233-07 · Cited by 384
Nazaries, L., Murrell, J. C., Millard, P., Baggs, L., & Singh, B. K. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12149 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Knief, C., Lipski, A., & Dunfield, P. F.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6703-6714
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2140128739
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and Activity of Methanotrophic Bacteria in Different Upland Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.11.6703-6714.2003
- The paper
- Knief, C., Lipski, A., & Dunfield, P. F. (2003). Diversity and Activity of Methanotrophic Bacteria in Different Upland Soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.11.6703-6714.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.