Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Depth Distribution of Microbial Diversity in Mono Lake, a Meromictic Soda Lake in California

Open access
Humayoun, Shaheen B., Bano, Nasreen, Hollibaugh, James T.·2003·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

We analyzed the variation with depth in the composition of members of the domain Bacteria in samples from alkaline, hypersaline, and currently meromictic Mono Lake in California. DNA samples were collected from the mixolimnion (2 m), the base of the oxycline (17.5 m), the upper chemocline (23 m), and the monimolimnion (35 m). Composition was assessed by sequencing randomly selected cloned fragments of 16S rRNA genes retrieved from the DNA samples. Most of the 212 sequences retrieved from the samples fell into five major lineages of the domain Bacteria : α- and γ- Proteobacteria (6 and 10%, respectively), Cytophaga - Flexibacter - Bacteroides (19%), high-G+C-content gram-positive organisms ( Actinobacteria ; 25%), and low-G+C-content gram-positive organisms ( Bacillus and Clostridium ; 19%). Twelve percent were identified as chloroplasts. The remaining 9% represented β- and δ- Proteobacteria , Verrucomicrobiales , and candidate divisions. Mixolimnion and oxycline samples had low microbial diversity, with only 9 and 12 distinct phylotypes, respectively, whereas chemocline and monimolimnion samples were more diverse, containing 27 and 25 phylotypes, respectively. The compositions of microbial assemblages from the mixolimnion and oxycline were not significantly different from each other ( P = 0.314 and 0.877), but they were significantly different from those of chemocline and monimolimnion assemblages ( P < 0.001), and the compositions of chemocline and monimolimnion assemblages were not significantly different from each other ( P = 0.006 and 0.124). The populations of sequences retrieved from the mixolimnion and oxycline samples were dominated by sequences related to high-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria (49 and 63%, respectively) distributed in only three distinct phylotypes, while the population of sequences retrieved from the monimolimnion sample was dominated (52%) by sequences related to low-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria distributed in 12 distinct phylotypes. Twelve and 28% of the sequences retrieved from the chemocline sample were also found in the mixolimnion and monimolimnion samples, respectively. None of the sequences retrieved from the monimolimnion sample were found in the mixolimnion or oxycline samples. Elevated diversity in anoxic bottom water samples relative to oxic surface water samples suggests a greater opportunity for niche differentiation in bottom versus surface waters of this lake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.69.2.1030-1042.2003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Humayoun, S. B., Bano, N., & Hollibaugh, J. T.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2003-02
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
1030-1042
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W1983829201
Cited by
375
References
0
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depth Distribution of Microbial Diversity in Mono Lake, a Meromictic Soda Lake in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.2.1030-1042.2003
The paper
Humayoun, S. B., Bano, N., & Hollibaugh, J. T. (2003). Depth Distribution of Microbial Diversity in Mono Lake, a Meromictic Soda Lake in California. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.2.1030-1042.2003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.