The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Anaerobic Growth on Xylose
Open accessAbstract
Xylose utilization is of commercial interest for efficient conversion of abundant plant material to ethanol. Perhaps the most important ethanol-producing organism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae , however, is incapable of xylose utilization. While S. cerevisiae strains have been metabolically engineered to utilize xylose, none of the recombinant strains or any other naturally occurring yeast has been able to grow anaerobically on xylose. Starting with the recombinant S. cerevisiae strain TMB3001 that overexpresses the xylose utilization pathway from Pichia stipitis , in this study we developed a selection procedure for the evolution of strains that are capable of anaerobic growth on xylose alone. Selection was successful only when organisms were first selected for efficient aerobic growth on xylose alone and then slowly adapted to microaerobic conditions and finally anaerobic conditions, which indicated that multiple mutations were necessary. After a total of 460 generations or 266 days of selection, the culture reproduced stably under anaerobic conditions on xylose and consisted primarily of two subpopulations with distinct phenotypes. Clones in the larger subpopulation grew anaerobically on xylose and utilized both xylose and glucose simultaneously in batch culture, but they exhibited impaired growth on glucose. Surprisingly, clones in the smaller subpopulation were incapable of anaerobic growth on xylose. However, as a consequence of their improved xylose catabolism, these clones produced up to 19% more ethanol than the parental TMB3001 strain produced under process-like conditions from a mixture of glucose and xylose.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In another study it was found that the adaptation to extreme temperature relied on the constitutive expression of GroEL/ES in E. coli[83]”
From Adaptive laboratory evolution—Principles and applications for biotechnology (2013) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cites
Verduyn, C., Postma, E., Scheffers, W. A., & van Dijken, J. P. (1992) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.320080703 · Cited by 1,510
Genetically Engineered Saccharomyces Yeast Capable of Effective Cofermentation of Glucose and Xylose
Ho, N. W. Y., Chen, Z., & Brainard, A. P. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.5.1852-1859.1998 · Cited by 541
Improvement of microbial strains and fermentation processes
Parekh, S. R., Vinci, V. A., & Strobel, R. J. (2000) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530000403 · Cited by 536
Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae
K�tter, P., & Ciriacy, M. (1993) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf00167144 · Cited by 507
Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Østergaard, S., Lisbeth Olsson, A., & Nielsen, J. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.1.34-50.2000 · Cited by 462
Metabolic engineering applications to renewable resource utilization
Aristidou, A. A., & Penttilä, M. E. (2000) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(00)00085-9 · Cited by 452
Directed evolution of biocatalysts
Arnold, F. H., & Volkov, A. A. (1999) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(99)80010-6 · Cited by 411
Lantz, A. E., Christensson, C., Wahlbom, C. F., & Hahn‐Hägerdal, B. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.8.3381-3386.2000 · Cited by 392
Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance
Patnaik, R., Louie, S., Gavrilovic, V., Perry, K., Stemmer, W. P. C., Ryan, C. M., & del Cardayré, S. B. (2002) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0702-707 · Cited by 377
Rosenzweig, R. F., Sharp, R. R., Treves, D. S., & Adams, J. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/137.4.903 · Cited by 357
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 251
Biomass Conversion Inhibitors andIn SituDetoxification
Liu, Z. L., & Blaschek, H. P. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9780470750025.ch12 · Cited by 66
Liu, E., & Hu, Y. F. (2009) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2009.10.011 · Cited by 65
Baumann, K., Adelantado, N., Lang, C., Mattanovich, D., & Ferrer, P. (2011) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-10-93 · Cited by 65
“cerevisiae cultivations (see for example [30]).”
Reversible amyloids of pyruvate kinase couple cell metabolism and stress granule disassembly
Cereghetti, G., Wilson-Zbinden, C., Kissling, V. M., Diether, M., Arm, A., Yoo, H., Piazza, I., Saad, S., Picotti, P., Drummond, D. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-021-00760-4 · Cited by 64
Self-citationNasution, U., van Gulik, W. M., Kleijn, R. J., van Winden, W. A., Proell, A. M., & Heijnen, J. J. (2006) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20842 · Cited by 64
d ‐Xylose consumption by nonrecombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae : A review
Lagos, M. A. P., Ortiz, J. P. D., Velásquez, M., & Stambuk, B. U. (2019) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.3429 · Cited by 65
Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce 1-hexadecanol from xylose
Guo, W., Sheng, J., Zhao, H., & Feng, X. (2016) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-016-0423-9 · Cited by 63
“cerevisiae successfully [33–35].”
Stambuk, B. U., Eleuthério, E. C. A., Pardo, L. M. F., Souto-Maior, A. M., & Bon, E. P. S. (2008) · Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research · Cited by 62
Recent advances in the microbial production of squalene
Paramasivan, K., & Mutturi, S. (2022) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-022-03273-w · Cited by 60
“It entails a process of continuous evolution with a selective gain for the variant exhibiting the desired trait (Sonderegger and Sauer 2003; Çakar et al.”
BackgroundBera, A. K., Sedlák, M., Khan, A. A. P., & Ho, N. W. Y. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2609-0 · Cited by 60
“Finally, the use of evolutionary engineering (Sonderegger and Sauer 2003; Kuyper et al. 2004; Wisselink et al. 2009) can also be applied for further improvement of our strain.”
BackgroundKöhler, K. A. K., Blank, L. M., Frick, O., & Schmid, A. (2014) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12537 · Cited by 59
Saini, P., Beniwal, A., Kokkiligadda, A., & Vij, S. (2017) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2017.07.013 · Cited by 59
Comparative Study of Natural and Artificial Flavoring Agents and Dyes
Dikshit, R., & Tallapragada, P. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811518-3.00003-x · Cited by 59
Çakar, Z. P., Alkım, C., Turanlı-Yıldız, B., Tokman, N., Akman, S., Sarıkaya, M., Tamerler, C., Benbadis, L., & François, J. (2009) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.024 · Cited by 57
Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for next generation ethanol production
den Haan, R., Kroukamp, H., Mert, M. J., Viljoen‐Bloom, M., Görgens, J. F., & van Zyl, W. H. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.4068 · Cited by 57
Verhoeven, M. D., de Valk, S. C., Daran, J.-M. G., van Maris, A. J. A., & Pronk, J. T. (2018) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/foy075 · Cited by 56
Transcription Analysis of Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Reveals Novel Responses to Xylose
Salusjärvi, L., Pitkänen, J., Aristidou, A. A., Ruohonen, L., & Penttilä, M. E. (2006) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:128:3:237 · Cited by 56
Qiu, Y., Wu, M., Bao, H., Liu, W., & Shen, Y. (2023) · Engineering Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.engmic.2023.100084 · Cited by 57
Understanding low radiation background biology through controlled evolution experiments
Lampe, N., Breton, V., Sarramia, D., Sime‐Ngando, T., & Biron, D. G. (2017) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12491 · Cited by 53
“…and protocols are already available, such as the prokaryote E. coli (Barrick et al., 2009; Lenski, Rose, Simpson, & Tadler, 1991), the eukaryote S. cerivasae (Ferea, Botstein, Brown, & Rosenzweig, 1999; Sonderegger & Sauer, 2003) and even the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Burke et al., 2010).”
MethodBengtsson, O., Jeppsson, M., Sonderegger, M., Parachin, N. S., Sauer, U., Hahn‐Hägerdal, B., & Gorwa‐Grauslund, M. F. (2008) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1638 · Cited by 50
“The laboratory strains C1 and C5 have been acquired by EMS mutagenesis and adaptation to anaerobic conditions on xylose in continuous culture (Sonderegger and Sauer, 2003) and BH42 has been obtained by breeding between industrial strain segregants and TMB3001 (Sonderegger et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSato, T. K., Liu, T., Parreiras, L. S., Williams, D. L., Wohlbach, D. J., Bice, B. D., Ong, I. M., Breuer, R. J., Li, Q., Busalacchi, D., et al. (2013) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01885-13 · Cited by 50
“NAD cofactor for xylitol dehydrogenase activity (17).”
Zeng, W.-Y., Tang, Y., Gou, M., Sun, Z.-Y., Xia, Z., & Kida, K. (2016) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-016-8046-y · Cited by 50
Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion to Ethanol bySaccharomyces
Liu, Z. L., Badal Chandra, S. A. H. A., & Slininger, P. J. (2014) · ASM Press eBooks · doi:10.1128/9781555815547.ch2 · Cited by 49
Sharma, N. K., Behera, S., Arora, R., & Kumar, S. (2016) · Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00449-016-1563-3 · Cited by 48
“Sonderegger and Sauer [43] generated two evolutionary strains of recombinant S.”
BackgroundJeong, D., Oh, E. J., Ko, J. K., Nam, J., Park, H.-S., Jin, Y., Lee, E. J., & Kim, S. R. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236294 · Cited by 46
“Adaptive evolution have been the most commonly used and the most effective approach to improve both the strains expressing the oxidoreductase pathway [3,9,10] and the strains expressing the isomerase pathway [11–13].”
MethodInverse metabolic engineering with phosphagen kinase systems improves the cellular energy state
Sauer, U., & Schlattner, U. (2004) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2003.11.004 · Cited by 45
“Recent examples of such evolved phenotypes with applied interest include improved pentose metabolism (Becker and Boles, 2003; Sonderegger and Sauer, 2003), incorporation of unnatural amino acids (Bacher and Ellington, 2001), and pH (Patnaik et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationGenome engineering for breaking barriers in lignocellulosic bioethanol production
Ulaganathan, K., Goud, S., Reddy, M., & Ulaganathan, K. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.028 · Cited by 45
Leandro, M. J., Spencer‐Martins, I., & Gonçalves, P. M. (2008) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/015511-0 · Cited by 45
“The ura2 mutants of S. cerevisiae strains TMB 3001 and C5 (Sonderegger & Sauer, 2003) were transformed with the high-copynumber plasmid pHXT7-GXS1 (Leandro et al., 2006), producing strains MJY7 and MJY9, respectively.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLópez‐Malo, M., García‐Ríos, E., Melgar, B., Sánchez, M., Dunham, M. J., & Guillamón, J. M. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1755-2 · Cited by 45
“Evolutionary engineering has been used for generating new industrial strains [13–15].”
MethodHa, S.-J., Kim, H., Lin, Y., Jang, M.-U., Galazka, J. M., Kim, T., Cate, J. H. D., & Jin, Y. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03253-12 · Cited by 40
Novy, V., Krahulec, S., Wegleiter, M., Müller, G., Longus, K., Klimacek, M., & Nidetzky, B. (2014) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-49 · Cited by 39
“Consequences of evolutionary engineering were assessed in pure sugar substrate fermentations [23,26,39], but also in lignocellulose hydrolyzate conversions [24,34].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLiu, M., Ding, Y., Xian, M., & Zhao, G. (2018) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-018-0900-4 · Cited by 39
“Bacteria like Escherichia coli generally employ a one-step pathway using xylose isomerase (XI) enzyme, whereas yeasts and mycelial fungi need two enzymatic–catalytic steps by reduction reaction of d-xylose reductase (XR) and oxidation reaction of xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) [18, 19].”
BackgroundZhang, B., Li, N., Wang, Z., Ya-jie Tang, A., Chen, T., & Zhao, X. (2014) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-6131-7 · Cited by 35
Ethanol Production from Traditional and Emerging Raw Materials
Rudolf, A., Karhumaa, K., & Hahn‐Hägerdal, B. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8292-4_23 · Cited by 34
Suga, H., Matsuda, F., Hasunuma, T., Ishii, J., & Kondo, A. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4298-3 · Cited by 32
“…Science and Technology, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodaicho, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan F. Matsuda :A. Kondo RIKEN Biomass Engineering Program, 1-7-22 Suehirocho, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan Katahira et al. 2008; Sonderegger and Sauer 2003; Verho et al. 2003; Watanabe et al. 2007).”
BackgroundJones-Burrage, S. E., Kremer, T. A., & McKinlay, J. B. (2019) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00193-19 · Cited by 33
“tested the addition of a readily available vitamin mixture (40) with B vitamins within the”
MethodHayes, D. J. M., & Hayes, M. H. B. (2009) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.171 · Cited by 33
“5 Ethanol from hemicellulose sugars (% of theoretical) c, d 59 [41] 86 [35] 59 [41] 59 93.”
MethodCrabtree-negative characteristics of recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Souto-Maior, A. M., Runquist, D., & Hahn‐Hägerdal, B. (2009) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.022 · Cited by 33
Schwartz, K., Wenger, J. W., Dunn, B. L., & Sherlock, G. J. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.140053 · Cited by 31
“…has been made over the past 30 years to address this issue, and through the use of metabolic engineering and directed evolution (Ho et al. 1998; Sonderegger and Sauer 2003; Kuyper et al. 2004; Matsushika et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2010; Ha et al. 2011) strains of S. cerevisiae that have the…”
BackgroundRao, R. S., Jyothi, C. P., Prakasham, R. S., Rao, C. S., Sarma, P. N., & Rao, L. V. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 31
Second Generation Bioethanol Production: The State of Art
Hemansi, Gupta, R., Yadav, G., Kumar, G., Yadav, A., Saini, J. K., & Kuhad, R. C. (2018) · Biofuel and biorefinery technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94797-6_8 · Cited by 31
Selection of quiescent Escherichia coli with high metabolic activity
Sonderegger, M., Schümperli, M., & Sauer, U. (2005) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2004.05.005 · Cited by 31
Self-citationProteome analysis of the xylose‐fermenting mutant yeast strain TMB 3400
Karhumaa, K., Påhlman, A., Hahn‐Hägerdal, B., Levander, F., & Gorwa‐Grauslund, M. F. (2009) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1673 · Cited by 30
“…methods such as mutagenesis, adaptation and evolutionary engineering have also been used to generate improved yeast strains (Attfield and Bell, 2006; Becker and Boles, 2003; Karhumaa et al., 2005; Kuyper et al., 2005; Pitkänen et al., 2005; Sonderegger and Sauer, 2003; Wahlbom et al., 2003b).”
MethodInfluentialZhu, L., Cai, Z., Zhang, Y., & Li, Y. (2013) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201300277 · Cited by 30
Sharma, S., & Arora, A. (2020) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s13213-020-01590-9 · Cited by 30
“This strategy includes several cycles of random mutations and sequential selection, which create genetic mutations involving the desired ones (Sauer and Schlattner 2004) and can be very effective in strain improvement (Overkamp et al. 2002; Sonderegger and Sauer 2003; Shi et al. 2014).”
BackgroundParamasivan, K., Abdulla, A., Gupta, N., & Mutturi, S. (2021) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.3559 · Cited by 27
“Evolutionary engineering involves the process of prolonged growth with a selective advantage towards the strain that expresses the desirable trait (Çakar et al., 2005; Sonderegger & Sauer, 2003).”
BackgroundLiu, T., Huang, S., & Geng, A. (2018) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation4030059 · Cited by 27
Chandukishore, T., Das, S., Das, P. K., Veeranki, V. D., & Prabhu, A. A. (2024) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.111971 · Cited by 25
Kłosowski, G., Mikulski, D., & Jankowiak, O. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23040848 · Cited by 25
Unreliable medical information on birth certificates.
Gore, D., Chez, R. A., Remmel, R. J., Harahan, M., Mock, M., & Yelverton, R. W. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 25
Systematic Applications of Metabolomics in Metabolic Engineering
Dromms, R., & Styczynski, M. P. (2012) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo2041090 · Cited by 24
Engineering of the redox imbalance of Fusarium oxysporum enables anaerobic growth on xylose
Panagiotou, G., Christakopoulos, P., Grotkjær, T., & Lisbeth Olsson, A. (2006) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2006.04.004 · Cited by 24
Vero, L. D., Solieri, L., & Giudici, P. (2011) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.2011.03140.x · Cited by 23
“Alternatively, evolutionary approaches are valuable for the selection of new strains with specific phenotypes, such as resistance to various stresses or efficient substrate utilization (Sonderegger and Sauer 2003; Kuyper et al. 2004; Cakar et al. 2009; Cadière et al. 2011).”
BackgroundSynthetic biology-driven microbial production of folates: Advances and perspectives
Yang, H. M., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Li, J., Du, G., & Chen, J. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124624 · Cited by 21
Klimacek, M., Kirl, E., Krahulec, S., Longus, K., Novy, V., & Nidetzky, B. (2014) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-13-37 · Cited by 21
“Following strains were used to construct the graph (starting with the lowest μ): BP10001 (this study), TMB3001-C1 [8], TMB3415 [14], IBB10A02 (this study), RWB202-AFX [9], TMB3421 [15], IBB10B05 (this study), TMB3422 [15], H131-A3SB-3 [17], TMB3420 [15], RWB17 [13], H131-A3CS [17], RWB18 [16], H131-A3-ALCS [17].”
BackgroundMethodChambers, P. J., Bellon, J. R., Schmidt, S. A., Varela, C., & Pretorius, I. S. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8292-4_20 · Cited by 21
High-Efficiency Biocatalytic Conversion of Thebaine to Codeine
Li, X., Krysiak-Baltyn, K., Richards, L., Jarrold, A., Stevens, G. W., Bowser, T. A., Speight, R. E., & Gras, S. L. (2020) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c00282 · Cited by 19
Gupta, J. A., Thapa, S., Verma, M., Som, R., & Mukherjee, K. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67635-w · Cited by 19
In vivo evolutionary engineering of a boron-resistant bacterium: Bacillus boroniphilus
Şen, M., Yılmaz, Ü., Baysal, A., Akman, S., & Çakar, Z. P. (2011) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-011-9557-2 · Cited by 18
Evolutionary engineering of Phaffia rhodozyma for astaxanthin-overproducing strain
Gong, J., Duan, N., & Zhao, X. (2012) · Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11705-012-1276-3 · Cited by 18
“4 Astaxanthin of evolved strain by cultured in medium with (1) ionone, (2) diphenylamine, (3) NaCl, (4) TiO2, (5) H2O2, (6) NaClO, and (7) the wild strain.”
BackgroundHigh Gravity Ethanol Fermentations and Yeast Tolerance
Bai, F., & Zhao, X. (2011) · Microbiology monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21467-7_5 · Cited by 18
Novy, V., Wang, R., Westman, J. O., Franzén, C. J., & Nidetzky, B. (2017) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0887-9 · Cited by 18
“Strain selection has mainly been based on aerobic [21, 22] or anaerobic growth on xylose [20, 23].”
BackgroundBetter Yeast for Better Wine — Genetic Improvement of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Wine Strains
Schuller, D. E. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3713-8_1 · Cited by 16
Gururajan, V. T., Gorwa‐Grauslund, M. F., Hahn‐Hägerdal, B., Pretorius, I. S., & Otero, R. R. C. (2007) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf03175055 · Cited by 16
“…Jin et al., 2002; Johansson and HahnHägerdal, 2002; Jeppsson et al., 2003; Verho et al., 2003) have been combined with a mutational approach (Wahlbom et al., 2003a) as well as evolutionary engineering (Sonderegger and Sauer, 2003), resulting in mutants that are able to grow on and ferment xylose.”
BackgroundAdaptive Evolution of Industrial Brewer’s Yeast Strains towards a Snowflake Phenotype
Kayacan, Y., Mieghem, T. V., Delvaux, F., Delvaux, F. R., & Willaert, R. (2020) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation6010020 · Cited by 15
“cerevisiae [16], increasing tolerance of S.”
Parachin, N. S., Bengtsson, O., Hahn‐Hägerdal, B., & Gorwa‐Grauslund, M. F. (2010) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1777 · Cited by 15
Zhang, B., Sun, H., Li, J., Wan, Y., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2016.04.019 · Cited by 15
Mezzetti, F., Fay, J. C., Giudici, P., & Vero, L. D. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180814 · Cited by 14
Basso, T. P., Procópio, D. P., Petrin, T. H. C., Giacon, T. G., Jin, Y., Basso, T. O., & Basso, L. C. (2023) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1093/lambio/ovad077 · Cited by 13
Heux, S., Fuchs, T. J., Buhmann, J. M., Zamboni, N., & Sauer, U. (2011) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-011-0386-0 · Cited by 13
Self-citationDing, W., Xiao, Z., Tang, X., Deng, K., Fu, S., Jiang, Y., & Yuan, L. (2011) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2011.09.019 · Cited by 13
Evolutionary metabolic engineering
Koffas, M. A. G., & del Cardayre, S. (2005) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2005.01.001 · Cited by 13
Tomitaka, M., Taguchi, H., Fukuda, K., Akamatsu, T., & Kida, K. (2013) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.05.027 · Cited by 12
Shen, Y., Hou, J., & Bao, X. (2013) · Bioengineered · doi:10.4161/bioe.25542 · Cited by 12
Kuivanen, J., Holmström, S., Lehtinen, B., Penttilä, M. E., & Jäntti, J. (2018) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201700593 · Cited by 12
Incorporating comparative genomics into the design–test–learn cycle of microbial strain engineering
Sardi, M. I., & Gasch, A. P. (2017) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/fox042 · Cited by 15
Metabolic and evolutionary engineering research in Turkey and beyond
Çakar, Z. P. (2009) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.200800332 · Cited by 10
“Thus, growth on xylose under anaerobic conditions was achieved at the end of the evolutionary engineering application [124].”
BackgroundFuel Ethanol Production from Lignocellulosic Raw Materials Using Recombinant Yeasts
Stanley, G. A., & Hahn‐Hägerdal, B. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9780470750025.ch13 · Cited by 10
High consistency enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose
Qin, W. (2010) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0069976 · Cited by 10
“Therefore, metabolic engineering of xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an attractive approach (Sonderegger and Sauer 2003).”
BackgroundGenetic Engineering for Strain Improvement in Filamentous Fungi
Garrigues, S., Martínez-Reyes, N., & de Vries, R. P. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819990-9.00006-8 · Cited by 10
Biotechnological Advances in Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production
Bhatia, L., Chandel, A. K., Singh, A. K., & Singh, O. V. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95480-6_3 · Cited by 8
Using microorganisms to brew biofuels
Rao, R. P., Dufour, N. P., & Swana, J. (2011) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-011-9374-3 · Cited by 8
Tani, T., Taguchi, H., Fujimori, K. E., Sahara, T., Ohgiya, S., Kamagata, Y., & Akamatsu, T. (2016) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.03.008 · Cited by 8
Integration of Ethanol Fermentation with Second Generation Biofuels Technologies
Häggström, C., Rova, U., Brandberg, T., & Hodge, D. B. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59498-3.00008-7 · Cited by 8
Strain Development by Whole-Cell Directed Evolution
Si, T., Lian, J., & Zhao, H. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50413-1_7 · Cited by 8
Mikulski, D., & Kłosowski, G. (2016) · Journal of Basic Microbiology · doi:10.1002/jobm.201600311 · Cited by 7
“cerevisiae calibration curve using Pharo 300 spectrophotometer by Merck 1 [19].”
MethodA Microbial Perspective on Ethanolic Lignocellulose Fermentation
Parachin, N. S., Hahn‐Hägerdal, B., & Bettiga, M. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-088504-9.00390-1 · Cited by 7
Chen, C., Tang, X., Xiao, Z., Zhou, Y., Jiang, Y., & Fu, S. (2013) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-013-0142-1 · Cited by 7
Gururajan, V. T., Rensburg, P. V., Hahn‐Hägerdal, B., Pretorius, I. S., & Otero, R. R. C. (2007) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf03175361 · Cited by 6
“…to using targeted metabolic engineering approaches (Bailey, 1991) to generate xylose-fermenting strains of S. cerevisiae, strains overexpressing XR, XDH and XK have been further improved by random evolutionary engineering strategies (Sauer, 2001; Sonderegger and Sauer, 2003; Wahlbom et al., 2003a).”
BackgroundLaviña, W. A., Sakurai, S. S. M., Pontrelli, S., Putri, S. P., & Fukusaki, E. (2020) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo10050192 · Cited by 6
Improving Yeast Strains for Pentose Hexose Co-fermentation: Successes and Hurdles
Sharma, S., Sharma, S., Singh, S., Lata, L., & Arora, A. (2016) · Springer proceedings in energy · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2773-1_3 · Cited by 6
Transcriptome and proteome analysis of xylose-metabolising Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Salusjärvi, L. (2008) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 6
Atta, O. M., Chen, L., Mohamed, H., Ullah, S., Abo-Kadoum, M. A., Abdel-Aziz, A. E., Taleb, K., Mosa, M. A., & Hassane, A. M. A. (2025) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108585 · Cited by 5
Evolutionary Engineering for Industrial Microbiology
Vanee, N., Fisher, A. B., & Fong, S. S. (2012) · Sub-cellular biochemistry/Subcellular biochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5055-5_3 · Cited by 5
Lee, S., Kim, E., Kim, J., & Oh, M. (2012) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2012.09.007 · Cited by 5
Nasution, U. (2007) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 5
Farra, N. (2010) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 5
Unbiased metabolic flux inference through combined thermodynamic and 13 C flux analysisPreprint
Saldida, J., Muntoni, A. P., Martino, D. D., Hubmann, G., Niebel, B., Schmidt, A. M., Braunstein, A., Milias‐Argeitis, A., & Heinemann, M. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.29.177063 · Cited by 6
“The normalised metabolite concentrations were converted into intracellular concentration using the dry weight / OD ratio of 0.52 (Sonderegger & Sauer, 2003) and the cell volume / dry weight ratio of 2 mL gCDW-1 (Van Urk et al, 1988).”
MethodInfluentialLiu, Z. L., & Song, M. Z. (2009) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781845935344.0136 · Cited by 4
Yeast Expression Systems: Current Status and Future Prospects
Adivitiya, Dagar, V. K., & Khasa, Y. P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2621-8_9 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonderegger, M., & Sauer, U.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Sauer, Uwe
- ORCID
- Sauer, Uwe
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1990-1998
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- PMC
- PMC154834
- OpenAlex
- W2115470699
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Office Fédéral de l'Education et de la Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae, xylose utilization, anaerobic growth, evolutionary engineering, ethanol production, glucose utilization, xylose catabolism, recombinant yeast strains
- MeSH terms
- Aldehyde Reductase, Anaerobiosis, Culture Media, Genetic Engineering, Pichia, Recombination, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sugar Alcohol Dehydrogenases, Xylose, Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor), Evolution, Molecular, D-Xylulose Reductase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review