The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biodiversity, Community Structural Shifts, and Biogeography of Prokaryotes within Antarctic Continental Shelf Sediment
Open accessAbstract
16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) clone library analysis was conducted to assess prokaryotic diversity and community structural changes within a surficial sediment core obtained from an Antarctic continental shelf area (depth, 761 m) within the Mertz Glacier Polynya (MGP) region. Libraries were created from three separate horizons of the core (0- to 0.4-cm, 1.5- to 2.5-cm, and 20- to 21-cm depth positions). The results indicated that at the oxic sediment surface (depth, 0 to 0.4 cm) the microbial community appeared to be dominated by a small subset of potentially r -strategist (fast-growing, opportunistic) species, resulting in a lower-than-expected species richness of 442 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). At a depth of 1.5 to 2.5 cm, the species richness (1,128 OTUs) was much higher, with the community dominated by numerous gamma and delta proteobacterial phylotypes. At a depth of 20 to 21 cm, a clear decline in species richness (541 OTUs) occurred, accompanied by a larger number of more phylogenetically divergent phylotypes and a decline in the predominance of Proteobacteria . Based on rRNA and clonal abundance as well as sequence comparisons, syntrophic cycling of oxidized and reduced sulfur compounds appeared to be the dominant process in surficial MGP sediment, as phylotype groups putatively linked to these processes made up a large proportion of clones throughout the core. Between 18 and 65% of 16S rDNA phylotypes detected in a wide range of coastal and open ocean sediments possessed high levels of sequence similarity (>95%) with the MGP sediment phylotypes, indicating that many sediment prokaryote phylotype groups defined in this study are ubiquitous in marine sediment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hall, T. A. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Symposium Series · doi:10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr-14998u1.29 · Cited by 38,297
Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity
Paine, R. T. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282400 · Cited by 5,361
Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population
Chao, A. (1984) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · Cited by 4,265
Estimating the Population Size for Capture-Recapture Data with Unequal Catchability
Chao, A. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531532 · Cited by 2,450
Impact of Culture-Independent Studies on the Emerging Phylogenetic View of Bacterial Diversity
Hugenholtz, P., Goebel, B. M., & Pace, N. R. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.18.4765-4774.1998 · Cited by 2,428
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
v. Wintzingerode, F. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00057-0 · Cited by 2,063
Global Dispersal of Free-Living Microbial Eukaryote Species
Finlay, B. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070710 · Cited by 1,825
Archaeal dominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific Ocean
Karner, M. B., DeLong, E. F., & Karl, D. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35054051 · Cited by 1,592
Missing lithotroph identified as new planctomycete
Strous, M., Fuerst, J. A., Kramer, E. H. M., Logemann, S., Muyzer, G., van de Pas-Schoonen, K. T., Webb, R., Kuenen, J. G., & Jetten, M. S. M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22749 · Cited by 1,575
The ecology of Cytophaga–Flavobacteria in aquatic environments
Kirchman, D. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(01)00206-9 · Cited by 1,304
Cited by
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Overview of the Marine Roseobacter Lineage
Buchan, A., González, J. M., & Moran, M. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.10.5665-5677.2005 · Cited by 844
Bacterial diversity in aquatic and other environments: what 16S rDNA libraries can tell us
Kemp, P. F., & Aller, J. Y. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00257-5 · Cited by 558
Deep-Sea Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable
Danovaro, R., Company, J. B., Corinaldesi, C., D'Onghia, G., Galil, B., Gambi, C., Gooday, A. J., Lampadariou, N., Luna, G. M., Morigi, C., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011832 · Cited by 431
Integration of Microbial Ecology and Statistics: a Test To Compare Gene Libraries
Schloss, P. D., Larget, B. R., & Handelsman, J. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.9.5485-5492.2004 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowman, J. P., & McCuaig, R. D.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2463-2483
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1973336836
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 20.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodiversity, Community Structural Shifts, and Biogeography of Prokaryotes within Antarctic Continental Shelf Sediment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.5.2463-2483.2003
- The paper
- Bowman, J. P., & McCuaig, R. D. (2003). Biodiversity, Community Structural Shifts, and Biogeography of Prokaryotes within Antarctic Continental Shelf Sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.5.2463-2483.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.