The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolation and Identification of Actinobacteria from Surface-Sterilized Wheat Roots
Open accessAbstract
This is the first report of filamentous actinobacteria isolated from surface-sterilized root tissues of healthy wheat plants ( Triticum aestivum L.). Wheat roots from a range of sites across South Australia were used as the source material for the isolation of the endophytic actinobacteria. Roots were surface-sterilized by using ethanol and sodium hypochlorite prior to the isolation of the actinobacteria. Forty-nine of these isolates were identified by using 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing and found to belong to a small group of actinobacterial genera including Streptomyces , Microbispora , Micromonospora , and Nocardiodes spp. Many of the Streptomyces spp. were found to be similar, on the basis of their 16S rDNA gene sequence, to Streptomyces spp. that had been isolated from potato scabs. In particular, several isolates exhibited high 16S rDNA gene sequence homology to Streptomyces caviscabies and S. setonii . None of these isolates, nor the S. caviscabies and S. setonii type strains, were found to carry the nec1 pathogenicity-associated gene or to produce the toxin thaxtomin, indicating that they were nonpathogenic. These isolates were recovered from healthy plants over a range of geographically and temporally isolated sampling events and constitute an important plant-microbe interaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Cited by
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants
Truyens, S., Weyens, N., Cuypers, A., & Vangronsveld, J. (2015) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12181 · Cited by 718
Inside the root microbiome: Bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion
Gaiero, J. R., McCall, C. A., Thompson, K. A., Day, N. J., Best, A. S., & Dunfield, K. E. (2013) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1200572 · Cited by 648
Biofilm formation in plant–microbe associations
Ramey, B. E., Koutsoudis, M., Bodman, S. B. V., & Fuqua, C. (2004) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.014 · Cited by 422
Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme?
Seipke, R. F., Kaltenpoth, M., & Hutchings, M. I. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00313.x · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Coombs, J. T., & Franco, C. M. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5603-5608
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2097535259
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and Identification of Actinobacteria from Surface-Sterilized Wheat Roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.9.5603-5608.2003
- The paper
- Coombs, J. T., & Franco, C. M. M. (2003). Isolation and Identification of Actinobacteria from Surface-Sterilized Wheat Roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.9.5603-5608.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.