Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitative Detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua by Real-Time PCR: Assessment of hly , iap , and lin02483 Targets and AmpliFluor Technology

Open access
Rodríguez-Lázaro, David, Hernández, Marta, Scortti, Mariela, Esteve, Teresa, Vázquez-Boland, José A., Pla, Maria·2004·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

We developed and assessed real-time PCR (RTi-PCR) assays for the detection and quantification of the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes and the closely related nonpathogenic species L. innocua . The target genes were hly and iap for L. monocytogenes and lin02483 for L. innocua . The assays were 100% specific, as determined with 100 Listeria strains and 45 non- Listeria strains, and highly sensitive, with detection limits of one target molecule in 11 to 56% of the reactions with purified DNA and 3 CFU in 56 to 89% of the reactions with bacterial suspensions. Quantification was possible over a 5-log dynamic range, with a limit of 15 target molecules and R 2 values of >0.996. There was an excellent correspondence between the predicted and the actual numbers of CFU in the samples (deviations of <23%). The hly -based assay accurately quantified L. monocytogenes in all of the samples tested. The iap -based assay, in contrast, was unsuitable for quantification purposes, underestimating the bacterial counts by 3 to 4 log units in a significant proportion of the samples due to serovar-related target sequence variability. The combination of the two assays enabled us to classify L. monocytogenes isolates into one of the two major phylogenetic divisions of the species, I and II. We also assessed the new AmpliFluor technology for the quantitative detection of L. monocytogenes by RTi-PCR. The performance of this system was similar to that of the TaqMan system, although the former system was slightly less sensitive (detection limit of 15 molecules in 45% of the reactions) and had a higher quantification limit (60 molecules).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.70.3.1366-1377.2004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Rodríguez-Lázaro, D., Hernández, M., Scortti, M., Esteve, T., Vázquez-Boland, J. A., & Pla, M.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2004-03
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
1366-1377
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2160418859
Cited by
246
References
0
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua by Real-Time PCR: Assessment of hly , iap , and lin02483 Targets and AmpliFluor Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.70.3.1366-1377.2004
The paper
Rodríguez-Lázaro, D., Hernández, M., Scortti, M., Esteve, T., Vázquez-Boland, J. A., & Pla, M. (2004). Quantitative Detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua by Real-Time PCR: Assessment of hly , iap , and lin02483 Targets and AmpliFluor Technology. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.3.1366-1377.2004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.