Cited by 625Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

PCR-Induced Sequence Artifacts and Bias: Insights from Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Clone Libraries Constructed from the Same Sample

Open access
Acinas, Silvia G., Sarma-Rupavtarm, Ramahi, Klepac-Ceraj, Vanja, Polz, Martin F.·2005·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

The contribution of PCR artifacts to 16S rRNA gene sequence diversity from a complex bacterioplankton sample was estimated. Taq DNA polymerase errors were found to be the dominant sequence artifact but could be constrained by clustering the sequences into 99% sequence similarity groups. Other artifacts (chimeras and heteroduplex molecules) were significantly reduced by employing modified amplification protocols. Surprisingly, no skew in sequence types was detected in the two libraries constructed from PCR products amplified for different numbers of cycles. Recommendations for modification of amplification protocols and for reporting diversity estimates at 99% sequence similarity as a standard are given.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.71.12.8966-8969.2005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCR introduces a bias in 16S tables because some amplicon sequences are amplified more efficiently than others.

    “Secondly, PCR introduces a bias in 16S tables, as some amplicon sequences will inevitably be amplified more efficiently than others (Acinas et al., 2005;Schloss et al., 2011) (Fig. 2).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Acinas et al., 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acinas, S. G., Sarma-Rupavtarm, R., Klepac-Ceraj, V., & Polz, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Corresponding author
Polz, Martin F.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2005-12
Volume
71
Issue
12
Pages
8966-8969
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2084443943
Cited by
625
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 37
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Keywords
PCR artifacts, 16S rRNA gene, bacterioplankton, clone libraries, sequence bias, sequence clustering, diversity estimation
MeSH terms
Animals, Plankton, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Library, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Artifacts, Evolution, Molecular, Taq Polymerase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review