The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composition and Distribution of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Aerobic Flocs and Granular Sludge
Open accessAbstract
Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) were quantified in flocculent and aerobic granular sludge developed in two sequencing batch reactors with the same shear force but different settling times. Several EPS extraction methods were compared to investigate how different methods affect EPS chemical characterization, and fluorescent stains were used to visualize EPS in intact samples and 20-μm cryosections. Reactor 1 (operated with a 10-min settle) enriched predominantly flocculent sludge with a sludge volume index (SVI) of 120 ± 12 ml g −1 , and reactor 2 (2-min settle time) formed compact aerobic granules with an SVI of 50 ± 2 ml g −1 . EPS extraction by using a cation-exchange resin showed that proteins were more dominant than polysaccharides in all samples, and the protein content was 50% more in granular EPS than flocculent EPS. NaOH and heat extraction produced a higher protein and polysaccharide content from cell lysis. In situ EPS staining of granules showed that cells and polysaccharides were localized to the outer edge of granules, whereas the center was comprised mostly of proteins. These observations confirm the chemical extraction data and indicate that granule formation and stability are dependent on a noncellular, protein core. The comparison of EPS methods explains how significant cell lysis and contamination by dead biomass leads to different and opposing conclusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What are Bacterial Extracellular Polymeric Substances?
Wingender, J., Neu, T. R., & Flemming, H.-C. (1999) · Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60147-7_1 · Cited by 655
Cited by
D’Abzac, P., Bordas, F., Van Hullebusch, E., Lens, P. N. L., & Guibaud, G. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2288-x · Cited by 337
Bourven, I., Bachellerie, G., Costa, G., & Guibaud, G. (2015) · Environmental Technology · doi:10.1080/09593330.2015.1034186 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- McSwain, B. S., Irvine, R. L., Hausner, M., & Wilderer, P. A.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1051-1057
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2125711856
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composition and Distribution of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Aerobic Flocs and Granular Sludge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.71.2.1051-1057.2005
- The paper
- McSwain, B. S., Irvine, R. L., Hausner, M., & Wilderer, P. A. (2005). Composition and Distribution of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Aerobic Flocs and Granular Sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.2.1051-1057.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.