The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening for Bacillus Isolates in the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract
Open accessAbstract
Spores from a number of different Bacillus species are currently being used as human and animal probiotics, although their mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. Here we describe the isolation of 237 presumptive gut-associated Bacillus spp. isolates that were obtained by heat and ethanol treatment of fecal material from organically reared broilers followed by aerobic plating. Thirty-one representative isolates were characterized according to their morphological, physiological, and biochemical properties as well as partial 16S rRNA gene sequences and screening for the presence of plasmid DNA. The Bacillus species identified included B. subtilis , B. pumilus , B. licheniformis , B. clausii , B. megaterium , B. firmus , and species of the B. cereus group, whereas a number of our isolates could not be classified. Intrinsic properties of potential importance for survival in the gut that could be advantageous for spore-forming probiotics were further investigated for seven isolates belonging to five different species. All isolates sporulated efficiently in the laboratory, and the resulting spores were tolerant to simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. They also exhibited antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria, including food spoilage and pathogenic organisms such as Bacillus spp., Clostridium perfringens , Staphylococcus aureus , and Listeria monocytogenes . Importantly, the isolates were susceptible to most of the antibiotics tested, arguing that they would not act as donors for resistance determinants if introduced in the form of probiotic preparations. Together, our results suggest that some of the sporeformers isolated in this study have the potential to persist in or transiently associate with the complex gut ecosystem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis
Branda, S. S., González-Pastor, J. E., Ben-Yehuda, S., Losick, R., & Kolter, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191384198 · Cited by 1,129
Cited by
Cutting, S. M. (2011) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.007 · Cited by 787
Khan, I., Ullah, N., Zha, L., Bai, Y., Khan, A., Zhao, T., Che, T., & Zhang, C. (2019) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens8030126 · Cited by 771
Structure, Assembly, and Function of the Spore Surface Layers
Henriques, A. O., & Moran, Jr. (2007) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093224 · Cited by 587
Self-citationEcology and genomics of Bacillus subtilis
Earl, A. M., Losick, R., & Kolter, R. (2008) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.03.004 · Cited by 560
Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production
Mingmongkolchai, S., & Panbangred, W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13690 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbosa, T. M., Serra, C. R., La Ragione, R. M., Woodward, M. J., & Henriques, A. O.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 968-978
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2171273159
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for Bacillus Isolates in the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.71.2.968-978.2005
- The paper
- Barbosa, T. M., Serra, C. R., La Ragione, R. M., Woodward, M. J., & Henriques, A. O. (2005). Screening for Bacillus Isolates in the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.2.968-978.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.