The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extracellular DNA in Single- and Multiple-Species Unsaturated Biofilms
Open accessAbstract
The extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of bacterial biofilms form a hydrated barrier between cells and their external environment. Better characterization of EPS could be useful in understanding biofilm physiology. The EPS are chemically complex, changing with both bacterial strain and culture conditions. Previously, we reported that Pseudomonas aeruginosa unsaturated biofilm EPS contains large amounts of extracellular DNA (eDNA) (R. E. Steinberger, A. R. Allen, H. G. Hansma, and P. A. Holden, Microb. Ecol. 43:416-423, 2002). Here, we investigated the compositional similarity of eDNA to cellular DNA, the relative quantity of eDNA, and the terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) community profile of eDNA in multiple-species biofilms. By randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, cellular DNA and eDNA appear identical for P. aeruginosa biofilms. Significantly more eDNA was produced in P. aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida biofilms than in Rhodococcus erythropolis or Variovorax paradoxus biofilms. While the amount of eDNA in dual-species biofilms was of the same order of magnitude as that of of single-species biofilms, the amounts were not predictable from single-strain measurements. By the Shannon diversity index and principle components analysis of TRFLP profiles generated from 16S rRNA genes, eDNA of four-species biofilms differed significantly from either cellular or total DNA of the same biofilm. However, total DNA- and cellular DNA-based TRFLP analyses of this biofilm community yielded identical results. We conclude that extracellular DNA production in unsaturated biofilms is species dependent and that the phylogenetic information contained in this DNA pool is quantifiable and distinct from either total or cellular DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What are Bacterial Extracellular Polymeric Substances?
Wingender, J., Neu, T. R., & Flemming, H.-C. (1999) · Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60147-7_1 · Cited by 655
Cited by
Flemming, H.-C., & Wingender, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2415 · Cited by 10,137
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Periasamy, S., & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381 · Cited by 1,309
Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3855-3 · Cited by 1,078
Mao, D., Luo, Y., Mathieu, J., Wang, Q., Feng, L., Mu, Q., Feng, C., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es404280v · Cited by 508
Effect of DNase and Antibiotics on Biofilm Characteristics
Tetz, G. V., Artemenko, N. K., & Tetz, V. V. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00471-08 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinberger, R. E., & Holden, P. A.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5404-5410
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2102252790
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracellular DNA in Single- and Multiple-Species Unsaturated Biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.71.9.5404-5410.2005
- The paper
- Steinberger, R. E., & Holden, P. A. (2005). Extracellular DNA in Single- and Multiple-Species Unsaturated Biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.9.5404-5410.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.