Cited by 163Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testingthermodynamics and calorimetric analysesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

THE CALCULATION OF MICROBIAL ASSAYS

Open access
Bliss, C. I.·1956·Bacteriological Reviews

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/br.20.4.243-258.1956

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In drug combination studies for cancer, Loewe additivity is appropriate when the drugs target the same pathways, whereas Bliss independence is more appropriate when two drugs are mutually nonexclusive, i.e. each targets a different signaling pathway.

    “In drug combination studies for cancer, the Loewe additivity is appropriate when the drugs target same pathways. In contrast, the Bliss independence principle is more appropriate when two drugs are mutually nonexclusive, i.e. when each target a different signaling pathway.”

    From Evaluation of Drug Combination Effect Using a Bliss Independence Dose–Response Surface Model (2018) · cites this paper as Bliss 1956

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. BLiss, C. I. 1952 The statistics of bioassay with special reference to the vitamins. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N. Y.
  2. BLiss, C.I. 1956a Confidence limits for measuring the precision of bioassays. Biometrics, 12, in press.
  3. BLiss, C. I. 1957 Bioassay from a parabola. Biometrics, 13, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bliss, C. I.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Bliss, C. I.
Venue
Bacteriological Reviews
Published
1956-12
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
243-258
ISSN
0005-3678 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2195725578
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bacteriological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
microbiological assay, bacterial growth kinetics
MeSH terms
Bacteriology, Biological Assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review